Showing posts with label composition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label composition. Show all posts

Thursday, March 16, 2017

"We're Only In It For The Money" - Frank Zappa [Full Album & Review]

Review by Steve Huey, and JaeOhEsH
Source: http://www.allmusic.com/album/were-only-in-it-for-the-money-mw0000628302
Release Date: September, 1968
Duration: 39:11
Genre: Experimental Pop/Rock
Styles: Experimental Pop/Rock
Recording Date: March 14, 1976 - August 9, 1967
Recommendation by: Nate Aldrich

 JaeOhEsH- This is the best social critique piece I’ve ever heard. Its hilarious and is Avant-Pop at its best. its filled with comedy, super confrontational and provocative language and production!

 Huey- From the beginning, Frank Zappa cultivated a role as voice of the freaks -- imaginative outsiders who didn't fit comfortably into any group. “We’re Only in It for the Money “is the ultimate expression of that sensibility, a satirical masterpiece that simultaneously skewered the hippies and the straights as prisoners of the same narrow-minded, superficial phoniness. Zappa’s barbs were vicious and perceptive, and not just humorously so: his seemingly paranoid vision of authoritarian violence against the counterculture was borne out two years later by the Kent State killings. Like “Freak Out” and “We’re Only in It for the Money” essentially devotes its first half to satire, and its second half to presenting alternatives. Despite some specific references, the first-half suite is still wickedly funny, since its targets remain immediately recognizable. The second half shows where his sympathies lie, with character sketches of Zappa’s real-life freak acquaintances, a carefree utopia in "Take Your Clothes Off When You Dance," and the strident, un-ironic protest "Mother People." Regardless of how dark the subject matter, there's a pervasively surreal, whimsical flavor to the music, sort of like Sgt. Pepper as a creepy nightmare. Some of the instruments and most of the vocals have been manipulated to produce odd textures and cartoonish voices; most songs are abbreviated, segue into others through edited snippets of music and dialogue, or are broken into fragments by more snippets, consistently interrupting the album's continuity. Compositionally, though, the music reveals itself as exceptionally strong, and Zappa’s politics and satirical instinct have rarely been so focused and relevant, making “We’re Only in It for the Money”quite probably his greatest achievement.   

"Music of Changes" - John Cage

Date: Composed in 1951. Premiered in New York, January 1, 1952.
Ensemble Type: Solo
Work Length: 43 minutes
Instrumentation: For solo piano.
Dedicatee: David Tudor
Publication: Peters Edition EP 6256, EP 6257, EP 6258, EP 6259 (4 volumes)
Source: http://johncage.org/pp/John-Cage-Work-Detail.cfm?work_ID=134

"Complete in 4 volumes. The title Music of Changes is variously meaningful, the first, of course, being reference to the Chinese oracle book the I Ching, or Book of Changes, of which Cage made extensive use in composing the piece. Another, more personal, reference is perhaps seen in the changes taking place in Cage's overall compositional language at the time. For this work, Cage employed I Ching-derived chance operations to create charts for the various parameters, i.e. tempi, dynamics, sounds and silences, durations, and superimpositions. With these charts, he was able to create a composition with a very conventional manner of notation, with staves and bars, where everything is notated in full detail. The piano is played not only by using the keys, but also by plucking the strings with fingernails, slamming the keyboard lid, playing cymbal beaters on the strings, striking the keyboard lid, etc. Use of the pedals is also notated in full detail. The notation is proportional, where 1 inch equals a quarter note. The rhythmic structure is 3, 5, 6 3/4, 6 3/4, 5, 3 1/8, and is expressed in changing tempi, including the use of accelerandi and ritards. This work may be seen as the first step of Cage's voyage into the world of chance composition. For Cage, this was a necessary first step in the giving up of individual taste and memory, as well as other previously meaningful traditions in the making of art. This development, in part, came as a result of his encounter and informal studies with Gita Sarabhai (Indian philosophy) and attendance at the lectures of Daisetz T. Suzuki (Zen Buddhism) in the late 1940s and into early 1950s. However, chance here only applies to the process of composition. The actual result, or composition, that derived by these means, along with the performance, are fixed and determined, things which Cage would also later abandon in subsequent compositions."