Showing posts with label collage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label collage. Show all posts

Sunday, November 23, 2008

CUT AND PASTE: COLLAGE AND THE ART OF SOUND, Kevin Concannon



from Sound by Artists (Art Metropole and Walter Phillips Gallery, 1990)

Though ill-considered as an artistic medium, sound recordings have been produced by visual artists within a variety of contexts since the beginning of the twentieth century and are numerous. Artists and individual works discussed in the following pages have been selected with an ear toward their individual merits, as representative of more general formal and aesthetic currents and for their significance within the broader context of twentieth century art and popular culture.
Taking off from Walter Benjamin's assessment of gramophone records as enabling 'the original to meet the beholder halfway.' 1 I have traced my way to the contradictory notion of the recording as the 'original,' ill-suited for live 'reproduction,' through the application of an essentially formalist, and ultimately photographic, critical apparatus.

The very idea of an Audio Art implies a genre defined foremost by formalist concerns. The recordings discussed cover a broad spectrum, including poetry, music, text and drama. The foundation upon which my arguments for sound recordings as works of art are based, is the popular understanding of mechanically reproduced media as accurate transcriptions of reality. Both photography and sound recording developed, not within the fine arts community, but rather within popular culture. Their substantial popular histories are inextricably linked to their capacity to 'capture' that specific time and place and to transform it into a piece of documentary evidence, whether it be Matthew Brady's Civil War or RCA's Caruso concert.

Music, in fact, has been one of the more problematic aspects of this study. For many, the Audio Arts are merely an extension of the musical avant garde and, as euphemisms go, only slightly less derog atory than 'experimental.' Many of the major advances in the Audio Arts have indeed been made by avant garde composers. John Cage, in many ways, serves as a pivotal figure in this history. Having produced work in several media, he is nonetheless best known as a composer. One of Cage's best known pieces, consists of four minutes and thirty-three seconds of silence (4'33" 1952). Rather than attempt to draw that nebulous line between composers and sound artists, it will suffice to state that SLIperficial distinctions, such as whether or not a particular individual works in a visual medium as well, or whether or not a particular individual has a record on the pop charts, will be held to a minimum. I have instead tried to focus on the medium of sound recording itself and the seeds of its practice as we know it.

As the primary product of the recording industry, music represents a substantial percentage of audio artworks. Regardless of what one chooses to call it, the influence of the recording medium itself has affected much of the 'music' recorded during our time, by rock musicians as well as 'experimental' or 'serious' composers and artists. When audio recording and play-back equipment came into general use, the very nature of being a composer or musician changed drastically. Composer Glenn Gould personifies this shift within the world of classical music, combining many takes of the same piece for the perfect (recorded) performance. Many recording artists are more competent with a recording studio than any traditional musical instrument. This trend has accelerated recently with the mass availability of digital processing and recording equipment. The genre of pop music currently known as til-han contemporary vividly demonstrates the shift in general use of the medium from 'accurate transcription of reality' to 'material for plastic manipulation.' Using pre-recorded discs of various beats and rhythm phrases, contemporary 'musicians' compose today's hip-hop, scratch and funk. Even within the realm of pop music there exists a demonstrable concern with the intrinsic qualities of the medium. The band Bonzo Goes To Washington achieved a modest commercial success with Five Minutes, a dance record sculpted around a recording of Reagan's infamous slip up, 'My fellow Americans. I am pleased to tell you today that we have just passed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever. We begin bombing in five minutes.' By processing the tape through a sampler, the President of the United States was transformed into a parody of the popular raving rap star, or vice-versa.



Some History

As with photography, sound recording has developed consistently toward a refinement of its greatest perceived virtue: its ability to recreate, ever more accurately, an event displaced from its original time and place. Both media were created to preserve real-time reality and subsequently, both have been manipulated by artists to create realities that exist only as reproduction. Sound works by artists evolved largely out of the tradition of performance art. The early recordings of Futurists and Dada artists, that begin the brief and intermittent history of artists' records, along with still photographs and precious little film footage, provide the best documents that we have of their real-time work. To this day, performance artists use recordings as a way to disseminate and promote their work.

Numerous recordings of Fillipo Marinetti, leader of the Futurists, have been preserved and are occasionally released on anthology LP's and audio cassette magazines.2 Along with a few recordings by Kurt Schwitters, Richard Huelsenbeck and Raoul Hausmann, these Marinetti pieces not only offer an aural glimpse of early performance art but pre-figure a lot of later work that only became possible with the wide availability of tape recorders and, more recently, digital audio sampling equipment.

While the tradition of sound poetry that developed from Marinetti's words-in-freedom and the Dada nonsense poetry of Hugo Ball and others is well known, both Marinetti and Kurt Schwitters became interested in manipulating sound with technology long before manipulation became common practice. Marinetti composed five pieces for radio performance in the 1930S that prefigured experiments with musique concrète of fifteen years later. 'Splicing' together several distinct sounds such as water, fire and human voices, he created his radio sintesi.

The manifesto of the Futurist Radiophonic Theatre was published by Marinetti and Pino Masnata in October 1933. The manifesto begins with a self-aggrandizing litany of Futurism's past accomplishments presented as a report of the Second National Congress of Futurism. Among those goals advocated by the conference are the 'overcoming of earth with the intuition of the means discovered to realize the trip to the Moon' and the 'overcoming of patriotism with a more fervid patriotism transformed into authentic religion for the country warning the semites to identify themselves with their different countries if they don't wish to disappear.3 While the former suggests the Futurists' faith in technology, the latter offers but one of many specific examples of their vile politics, certainly a major factor contributing to the scholarly neglect of Futurist work of this period.

At the point in this document when the issue of radio is brought up, the authors begin by citing the miracle of television and their anticipation of teletactilism and teletaste. While waiting, however, they would perfect the art of radio. Much of what is said reiterates the theories of Rudolf Arnhelm and others, stating that their radio 'begins where theatre, cinema and narration end.' In addition to prescribing the use of noise, Marinetti's own words-in-freedom and simultaneous action that were the staples of Futurist performance, the manifesto proposes several other practices that were more specific to radio. Some of them were to be realized only much later:

Detection, amplification and transfiguration of vibrations given out by materials. As today we listen to the song of the forest or the sea, tomorrow we will be seduced by the vibrations of a diamond or a flower.

This notion of the amplification of 'microscopic' audio phenomena has been realized more recently by such artists as Richard Lerman and Lief Brush. Both use modern microphones and electronics to 'blow up' tiny sounds, normally not heard by the human ear. Lerman, for example, uses piezo microphones to amplify the sounds of metal as activated by a blowtorch. Brush surgically implants miniature microphones into trees to make audible the sounds of trees growing. In both cases, the microphone is analogous to the microscope. While today such extreme amplification can be accomplished, in 1933 it would have been quite impossible; and their intuitive foresight on this point should be recognized as being as startling as their visions of lunar landings.

Other prescriptions in their manifesto that are more recently familiar include the 'utilization of interferences among radio stations and of the rising and fading of sounds' and the 'geometric limitation and building of silence.'

As best as I can determine, the actual practice of Futurist radio at this time was limited to presentations of live performances of Marinetti's plays and sound poems which were also recorded and pressed as phonograph records. Marinetti wrote five scores for radio syntheses that same year although they were not published until 1938. Three of these pieces dealt specifically with the 'limitation and construction of silence':

Silences Speaking to Each Other

15 seconds of pure silence
Do re mi on flute
8 seconds of pure silence
Do re mi on flute
29 seconds of pure silence
So on piano
Do on trumpet
40 seconds of pure silence
Do on trumpet
Wheh wheh wheh of baby boy
2 seconds of pure silence
1 minute of rrr of motor
2 seconds of pure silence
Surprised Oooooh of 2-year-old girl


The Building of a Silence

Build a left wall with a drum roll (half a minute)
Build a right wall with a din, a downtown car / street car horn, voices and screeches (half a minute)
Build a floor with a gurgling of water in pipes (half a minute)
Build a ceiling terrace with chirp chirp chirp srschirp of sparrows and swallows (20 seconds)


Battle of Rhythms

A cautious and patient slowness expressed by a tack tack tack of dripping water, first then killed by A flying arpeggioing elasticity of notes on the piano, first cut then killed by

ringing of an electric bell, first cut then killed by
silence of three minutes. first cut then killed by
palpitation of key in lock, tah trum track, followed by
silence of one minute 4
In Silences Speak to Each Other, the emphasis on the segments of 'pure' silence seems fairly straightforward. The use of conventional orchestral instruments, something not in keeping with the rhetoric of Futurism, is apparently intended to provide a delimitation of the periods of silence in something of a figure / ground reversal. The use of 'concrete' sounds, non-musical sounds accurately transcribed onto records from life, better fulfill the Futurist program as set forth in manifestos such as Russolo's Art of Noises. For example, the motor and vehicle noises in the first two pieces are characterisitc of the Futurist's glorification of the machine. While it would have been relatively easy to realize the first piece with the help of a few musical instruments, voices and theatre sound effects records that were plentiful at the time, the sculptural, three dimensional quality of The Building of a Silence would have been rather ineffective given the fact that stereo separation did not yet exist in either recording or broadcast media. A truly successful realization of the score would really require quadrophonic sound. In Daniele Lombardi's reconstruction of the piece on the Cramps Record Musica Futurista (1980), the left and right walls were created using stereo recording.

The one minute silence that concludes the third piece leaves the listener in doubt as to when the piece actually ends. The Lombardi reconstruction first came to my attention through an Austrian radio producer who mentioned that she had doubts about its suitability for airplay as silence is commonly considered as 'dead air' and frowned upon by radio regulators. Michael Kirby asserts that the nature of radio programing in the 1930s was much different than it is now, and at the time when Marinetti's scores were written, listeners were more likely to tune in for a specific program and less likely to be station scanning as is the general custom today.5 John Cage would later become famous for his piece, 4'33", which consisted of four minutes and thirty-three seconds of silence. Cage's silence, however, was not 'pure' and allowed for the ambient sounds of the concert hall. Marinetti's silence, of course, could not have been 'pure' in any radio broadcast then or now unless white noise constitutes purity.

Marinetti and Masnata also called for 'fights of sounds and different distances, namely the spatial drama added to the temporal drama. If the spatial drama of which the manifesto speaks seems improbable in a sculptural sense, as the later score suggests, the Drama of Distances might fulfill a more literal interpretation:

Drama of Distances

II seconds of it military march in Rome
II seconds of a tango danced in Santos
II seconds of Japanese religious music played in Tokyo
II seconds of a lively country dance from around Varèse
II seconds of a boxing match in New York
II seconds of street noises in Milan
II seconds of a Neapolitan song sung in the Cape Cabana Hotel in Rio de Janeiro
If The Building of Silence failed to create a physical sense of dis tance due to the technical limitations of the era, Drama of Distances would certainly have conveyed at least a referential sense of distance with its juxtaposition of easily identified sounds from specific places.

While it is unclear whether or not Marinetti ever realized these scores, Kurt Schwitters was among the first to approach sound recording as a plastic medium. Using sound film, Schwitters edited and collaged his nonsense poems after he recorded them and before he pressed them into records. Everett C. Frost cites Klaus Sch6ning's talk given at the International Congress on the Evolution of Broadcasting:

Klaus Schöning remarked that Kurt Schwitters was the first to experiment with such manipulations - even before there was audiotape. In the days when recordings were made on wax cylinders. Schwitters dubbed the recording onto film and edited the film into an audio collage."6

With the introduction of tape recording technology many years later, this idea of editing sound became more commonplace, no doubt taking its lead from cinematic technique.

The notion of collaging sounds from life to create music is most commonly associated with Pierre Schaeffer, head of the Radiodiffusion broadcast studios in Paris, in the 1940s. It is to Schaeffer that the term musique concrète is attributed. Using his Paris broadcast studios, he began his experiments in 1942. In America, John Cage was the first to create a Inusique concrete work. In the same year that he presented the notorious 4'33" (1952), he introduced his first piece composed specifically for magnetic tape. Williams Mix was constructed from a library of recorded sounds divided into six types: country sounds, city sounds, electronic or synthetic sounds, windproduced sounds (including songs), manually-produced sounds and small sounds requiring amplification to be heard with the others. The various sounds were played on eight discrete tracks of recording tape so that they overlapped. The score for the piece was determined using the I Ching, the ancient Chinese Book of Changes which Cage has used often throughout his career. The use of tape libraries and chance operations would later become common compositional techniques for experimental composers.

To some extent, Cage was influenced by Futurist and Dada art. He cites the work of Marinetti and Russolo in his early writings and he was a close friend to Marcel Duchamp. The extended capabilities of new recording technology made possible the realization of most (largely) theoretical work proposed in the early part of the century. Artists were not, however, the only people to realize this. When Leopold Stokowski began broadcasting in 1929, he was astonished to discover that in addition to a carefully planned seating arrangement of his orchestra, certain instruments could be emphasized or buried with the use of the mixing console. Encouraged by his experience, in 1931 he proclaimed that 'the composer of the future will create his harmonies directly in tone by means of electrical-musical instruments which will record his idea exactly.7 Working in collaboration with Bell Laboratory, Stokowski, by the late 1930s, had created stereophonic recordings twenty-five years before stereo was introduced.



The Influence of Recording Technology on Popular Music

By the mid-1960s popular musicians began to exploit the sophlisticated technology of the recording studio. This phenomenon prompted the Beatles to announce that they were retiring from touring because it was impossible to 'reproduce' their recorded music live. On their White Album, the track Revolution Number Nine introduced musique concWte to a wide audience. This track instigated the 'Paul is dead' rumour. As the attorney F. Lee Bailey demonstrated on a special television program dedicated to a discussion of this rumour, when played backwards on a turn-table the phrase 'number nine ... number nine,' repeated throughout the piece, became 'turn me on deadman.' Other artists began to use pre-recorded tapes both in the studio and in the live concert context. Holger Czukay (one of the founding members of the German rock group Can) worked extensively with musique concrète and has produced several albums that were very influential with contemporary musicians such as David Byrne and Brian Eno.

In addition to the use of prepared tapes, by the 1970s rock bands began to perform live using technology that had previously been limited to the recording studio. Brian Eno, as a member of the art-rock band Roxy Music, began playing synthesizers and treating other instruments with electronic filters during live performances. In h' s subsequent solo studio recordings, Eno adopted chance techniques of composition in addition to his extreme manipulation and collaging of sound. He has acknowledged the influence of Cage specifically in relation to his tape music and chance operations. Along with painter Peter Schmidt, he created Oblique Strategies (1975), a set of cards with instructions and suggestions that may be applied to a variety of creative activities. While recording in the studio, he would place the cards face down around the room. When confronted with a creative problem, one or several cards could be consulted for inspiration and direction. Over ioo cards offered a variety of suggestions:

Give way to your worst impulse
Emphasize the flaws
Use 'unqualified' people
The most important thing is the thing most easily forgotten
Eno employs these Oblique Strategies in the creation of his own audio and video work and on recordings that he produces for other bands. His influence is best known through his work with popular recording artists Talking Heads, including their recording of Hugo Ball's I Zimbra, the most obvious example of the Futurist/Dada legacy as manifested in pop music. Talking Heads member David Byrne has commented:

I remember hearing an old recording of Kurt Schwitter's Ur Sonata when I was in school. It struck me as very musical, very rhythmic ... (almost funky) ... very funny and very entertaining. It was one of the first times I had heard the musicality of 'language' made so explicit. It didn't matter that it was a made up language.

Later I read that a very similar thing was happening in Russia at about the same time ... they were performing elaborate stage productions in a I nonsense' language. Alice in Wonderland had already been published. Gertrude Stein wrote The Making of Americans at the same time, in another city. Although not nonsense ... her writing sometimes made the perceptual and thinking processes explicit in a way that could seem irrational ... yet musical.

There seemed to be an enthusiasm in the air ... an excitement about the possibility of creating a new language ... or re-ordering the existing language to meet new ends.

I have always been fascinated with manipulating orjuxtaposing irrational elements in a formal, almost 'logical' manner. It seems to me that this is the way things are.

Using Hugo Ball's text for I Zimbra was Brian Eno's suggestion. I felt it was the perfect solution to the quandary we had gotten ourselves into: how do we have a 'chant-like' vocal that doesn't place undue emphasis on the lyric content. We continued to use 'found' vocals over rhythmic beds on My Life in the Bush of Ghosts ... We hoped to emphasize the emotive force of the voice(s) as represented only by their sound and texture. For us, the emotion came across strongly ... there was no need to understand in a logical or narrative manner what the words were about ... the intense emotion carried by the quality of the voice, the melody, the rhythms, and the relationship of the vocal to the music (in two pieces we used almost the same bit of found vocal ... against different music ... and the effect was completely different). For us it was not only a good 'idea,' but an emotional experience.8

By the mid-1970s, it seemed that art schools were producing more rock artl sts than painters or sculptors. Talking Heads was formed when its original members were students at the Rhode Island School of Design. John Lennon had been an art student before hitting it big with the Beatles. When he and Fluxus artist Yoko Ono made 'happenings' together in the late ig6os - their sleep-in for peace, for example - the love-affair between art and rock began to flourish. Bands like The Art of Noise, Cabaret Voltaire and Bauhaus had emerged by the early 1980s, taking their names, and to varying extents their creative sensibilities, from a Russolo manifesto, a Dada nightclub, and a German art school respectively. The Art of Noise recorded their first records for the Zang Tumb Tumb label, the name of which is the title for Marinetti's most famous sound poem of which two recordings exist (1924 and 1935). The Art of Noise's first hit, Close to the Edit, begins with the sound of an automobile engine starting, used as a percussive element. Today it's sometimes hard to distinguish between the artists and the pop stars. Looking through the bins of a local record store can be like flipping through a history of twentieth century art.

The collage sensibility has been appropriated by recording artists of all sensibilities. In the 1950s, Buchanan and Goodman predicted the postmodern fever of the ig8os with their hit, The Flying Saucer, in which they pieced together bits of hits such as I Hear You Knockin and Earth Angel with segues of newscaster patter about platters from outer space. They even released a novelty Christmas record called Santa and the Satellite using the same formula. As with many of the contemporary collage platters, Buchanan and Goodman soon found themselves facing lawsuits for copyright infringement. A current example of this problem concerns a piece by Steinski and the Mass Media that cannot be sold commercially due to the legal complications involved with the appropriated bits, but was included free with New Music Express (February 1987). The Motorcade Sped On begins with Ed McMahon's famous introduction, 'Here's Johnny,' is followed by John Kennedy's 'Ask not what your country can do for you ...' rap, and is mixed with Walter Cronkite's 1963 coverage of the JFK assassination, all anchored by a funk beat.



The Influence of Pop Music on Fine Art

A lot of visual artists who had seen their former classmates abandon their paintbrushes and chisels for the pop life thought they could have it both ways. As it turned out, they could. In 1967 Andy Warhol brought the 'total artwork' into the rock and roll era with his Exploding Plastic Inevitable, a psychedelic spectacle that featured a light show and The Velvet Underground. Originally presented in the nightclub that he ran briefly, the Exploding Plastic Inevitable went on the road. The Velvet Underground and Nico produced by Andy Warhol was released by Verve records that year and featured cover art by Warhol.

Meanwhile, in the world of 'serious' music, Steve Reich had begun his tape recorder experiments in 1965. It's Gonna Rain featured the voice of Brother Walter, a Pentecostal preacher whom Reich recorded on the streets of San Francisco. Reich created two identical tape loops of the preacher's sermon about the end of the world. The loops are played simultaneously and allowed to gradually shift out of phase with one another creating, as Reich calls it, 'a controlled chaos.' Brian Eno, among others, has cited Reich as an inspiration for his own work with tape loops.

Throughout the 1960s, Brion Gysin and William S. Burroughs worked with tape recorders and scissors to create audio cut-ups. Burroughs cites the early Dada experiments of Tristan Tzara and others as influences on his tape recorder experiments along with the writing method of Gysin. Burroughs later came to exert a tremendous influence on rock musicians of the 1970s. Artists ranging from Patti Smith to David Bowie have acknowledged him as a source for their own work. The industrial band Throbbing Gristle released a collection of Burrough's cut-ups on their Industrial Records Label. The album was entitled Nothing Here Now But The Recordings (1959-1980), (1981).

By the 1970s, performance art had experienced a tremendous growth. Laurie Anderson's first performance in 1972, Automotive, took place in Rochester, Vermont. It was a concert of automobile horns inspired, says the artist, by the local custom of blowing horns instead of applauding at local concerts. While its inspiration was apparently more contemporary, the piece reflects the aesthetic of Futurist performance in its use of 'noise.' Another precedent would be the Concert of the Factory Whistle (1922), in Baku, USSR.

By 1974 Anderson had begun to use pre-recorded elements in her performances. For Duets on Ice she wore ice skates embedded in blocks of ice. A hidden tape recorder played songs that she accompanied on violin. When the ice melted, the performance ended. Different performances featured cowboy songs and classical pieces by other performers who became unknowing 'collaborators.' In 1975 she invented her tape-bow violin, for which she wrote Ethics is the Esthetics of the Few-ture (Lenin), and Song for Juanita. Lengths of magnetic tape with spoken texts on them replaced the horsehair of the violin bow; to the bridge of the violin, she attached a tape recorder play-back head wired to an amplifier. By moving the tape (bow) against the play-back head at different points along the tape, and by reversing the direction of tape travel, she manipulated the text. Song for Juanita is a particularly clever work. From the word Jaunita, she created a 'triangaural translation.' As Anderson explains:

The first syllable Juan- or one- reverses as no, producing a rhythmic no-one-no-one; the last syllable -ta is variously ellided with -an to pro duce ata-nta ata nta (anata).

This song was performed in Paris, September 1977 and simultaneously translated into French. That is: no-per-one-sonne-etc.9 The Paris performance thus incorporated French, English and Spanish variations of the word Juanita or no-one. The English version appears on Airwaves anthology, published by One Ten Records in 1977.

The tape-bow violin works are not really songs in the popular sense. They are language pieces that extend the cut-up verse of the Dada and Futurist poets in a way that is much more sophisticated both semantically and technologically.10 However, that same year, Anderson created several pop-style records for her Jukebox installation. One of the songs, It's Not the Bullet (A Reggae Tune for Chris Burden), was issued in a small edition. The title and the lyrics refer to Burden's performance, Shoot (1971), in which a marksman, standing five steps away, accidently shot the artist in the arm. According to Janet Kardon, Anderson had originally intended to release the Jukebox songs as an album but decided against it being not fully satisfied with them.11

Anderson's songs surfaced on two records in 1977: New Music for Electronic and Recorded Media and Airwaves. The former featured the works of women electronic composers including Annea Lockwood, Pauline Oliveros and Megan Roberts; the latter included work by conceptual, performance and visual artists such as Vito Acconci, Terry Fox, Jacki Apple, Meredith Monk and Richard Nonas. In 1981, Anderson's single O Superman reached number two on the British pop charts and she signed a record deal with Warner Brothers. The record had originally been released on the One Ten label. Concurrent with Anderson's successful cross-over from performance art venues to the pop charts, performance artists surfaced on several anthologies of recorded works by artists.

Revolutions Per Minute: The Art Record was issued by the Ronald Feldman Gallery in 1982. Chris Burden contributed a poem, The Atomic Alphabet; other artists' contributions consist of spoken texts and documentary recordings of lectures and interviews. Les Levine contributed a country and western tune. Hannah Wilke's Stand Up is a feminist anthem. David Smyth orchestrated three typewriters for his piece, Typewriter in D.

Another important compilation, Live To Air: artists' sound works, was edited by Bill Furlong and Michael Archer and published by Audio Arts in 1982. Included on these three cassette tapes are works by 45 artists categorized under the following headings: Rock Idioms, Images and Narrative, Technological and Audial Space, and Urban Reference. This diverse and international collection featured artists such as Art & Language, Clive Robertson, Arleen Schloss, David Cunningham, Helen Chadwick and Stuart Brisley. Making reference to the space that the soundworks in this compilation occupy, Bill Furlong states in his introduction:

In many respects this audial / technological 'space' is parallel to the physical space of a gallery, yet extends it through the potential of widespread dissemination inherent in the multiple production of cassettes and through broadcasting.12

In 1983, High Performance magazine issued its issue No. 23 as a two-album set, featuring songs by performance artists. Editor Linda Frye Burnham is represented with a blues song Downtown Blues. Jo Harvey Allen's Penitentiary of Jealousy would sound at home in a truck stopjukebox. Intermedia artist and radio producer Jacki Apple layers her own spoken text over music to create a poetic portrait of Idaho. She considers the recording studio and its technological instruments to be compositional tools.

Citing the growing number of performance artists who write and perform songs, editor Burnham states that:

From talking to each of these artists, I have found that commercial success is among their goals, but not at the cost of compromise.13

At least one of the contributing artists, Terry Allen, had met with some success in the business when his New Delhi Freight Train was recorded by the rock group Little Feat in 1979. Allen recorded the song himself on his 1979 album Lubbock (on everything) (Fate Records). Like many of his tunes, New Delhi Freight Train is a pretty straightforward country and western song. A few poke fun at the art world. Truckload of Art is about an accident:

Yeah a truckload of art

Is burning on the highway

Precious objects are scattered

All over the ground

And it's a terrible sight

If a person were to see it

But there weren't nobody around

Following a long tradition of records as after-the-fact documentation of performance (that begins chronologically with Marinetti's recordings of his sound poems), The Uproar Tapes: Volume One (Island Records, 1986) preserves works by Eric Bogosian, Ann Magnuson, David Cale, Ethyl Eichelberger, Richard Prince and Karen Finley. All of these works were created for a live performance context. Ann Magnuson's piece, Madefor Radio, stands out in that it is more than just a straight documentation of a live performance. For the recording Magnuson presents three of her radio-identified chat-acters: Tiffany LaFox, talk show hostess / porn queen; Sister Alice Tully Hall, radio evangelist; and pop singer Fallopia, protegé of Prince. The three characters are separated by the sound of a radio tuner scanning the airwaves, thus incorporating the 'interference between radio stations' that Marinetti suggested in his La Radia manifesto and that has been used in commercial work for years.

Artsounds Collection (Philips / Polygram records, 1986) was produced by Jeff and Juanita Gordon and contains songs, readings and interviews by and with artists. As with the earlier Revolutions Per Minute, this set was issued in two versions; standard editions including a poster and a deluxe limited edition with signed and numbered artist's prints. Highlights of Artsounds Collection include a Larry Rivers jazz track, a Jonathan Borofsky song with electronic score and a song by Michael Cotton and Prairie Prince of the rock band The Tubes. The decade of the 'cross-over artist' has apparently come full circle.

Many other visual artists have made records. Yves Klein issued a record in 1959, Concert of Vacuum, which contained no sound at all, reinforcing his concept of the 'void.'14 In the 1960s and 1970s, a few recordings of sound sculptures were made to document that work; conceptual artists also employed phonograph records for documentary purposes during this period.15 Fluxus artist Yoko Ono has made several records in collaboration with John Lennon and solo recordings prior to and since Lennon's death. Her own recorded work has evolved from Fluxus performance (performing in a burlap sack, screaming with the Plastic Ono Band on Live Peace in Toronto, 1969, for example) to more commercial rock records such as the 1985 Starpeace, that contains hard-rock and conventional ballads. Painter and musician A.R. Penck has recorded several albums of improvised jazz in recent years.

Artist Jonathan Borofsky has been using audio in his multimedia installations since 1983. In 1982 he began noticing that the sound energy that occurred naturally in his exhibitions gave the installations a special character. At the time, the energy emanated from the ping-pong tables that he frequently included in his shows - or more precisely from the gallery visitors playing ping-pong - and from the enormous mechanized sculptures of Hammering Men. The whining of the Hammering Men's motors and the gasps and cries of the ping-pong players sparked Borofsky's interest in sound as yet another element of his multi-media installations. He soon began collaborating on sound works with New York musician, painter and filmmaker Ed Tomney.

A carnival-like atmosphere characterizes Borofsky's exhibitions. Paintings sing, sculptures sing and Sounds of the World resound throughout, catalogued one after the other on tape. Another tape-music piece that appears in Borofsky's shows, Music-for Numbers, Computer and Voice (Reggie), was issued in cassette format by Reach Out International Records in 1987 (ROIR A-149) as Opus for Voice, Movements 1, 2, 3. under the name The Radical Songbirds of Islam (Borofsky and Tomney). The piece is based on Borofsky's counting. He began counting from zero in 1969 and is up to over 3 million now. Tomney designed a computer program to translate the numbers that Borofsky sporadically gives him into a score constructed from a library of tones sung by Borofsky and stored on audiotape. The aleatory nature of the piece suggests the influence of composers ranging from Eno to Cage and the numbered balls of Duchamp, with which he composed his The Bride Stripped Bare By Her Bachelors, Even. Erratum Musical. 16

A more recent cassette of Borofsky / Tomney music, with the working title Two Dogs in Your Helmet, combines a selection of real events, treated and re-configured into a new formal framework. They use both analogue (tape) and digital (micro-chip) samples of recorded sounds citing a dlistinct difference between the quality of reproduction, to weave together everything from guitar tracks to the sound of spilling pebbles:

It's rather like making a drawing or painting with which you start with no specific idea other than to begin to have fun with the brush or the colour and to just let it happen. 17

The pieces range from collages of Voices to 'Instrumental' tracks such as Lou, Level Ran in which the sounds of jet engines and people yelling are panned across the stereo spectrum. This piece was inspired by the bombing of Tripoli. For Hope in Chinese Means Forever a cheery melody is constructed with the sampled sounds of someone blowing into a bottle. In We, the only track that uses a first person narrative, the singers, Borofsky / Tomney, are the 'dogs on the block.' They 'see you leave and see you come home again.' Gurgling water is the only readily identified sound other than voices and much of the song's considerable charm lies in the instrumentation, that tugs at one's curiosity for an explanation. There's enough of the familiar and alien to create a world that is equally intriguing both sensually and intellectually. Using recorded sounds, distorted and manipulated with electronics, Borofsky and Tomney tread the thin line between 'accurate transcriptions of reality' and invention.

Jack Goldstein, known for his paintings of astral phenomena based on photographs, is another contemporary artist who makes records using sounds of the world. He made three series of them between 1976 and 1979 that were compiled from existing sound effects records and in some cases minimally altered. The first of the three suites of records were made in a seven-inch 45 rpm format on coloured vinyl. The titles and the vinyl colours reflected the sound effects contained on the records. The Dying Wind was pressed on clear vinyl, suggesting the ephemeral quality of the wind. The third series was pressed on ten-inch discs (a non-standard format) of black vinyl with different coloured labels on each side. On one record the white label side contained the sound of an airplane landing, while the opposite, silver label side preserved the sounds of dropping bombs whistling to their destination but never making contact. Many of these records emphasize the 'framing' of sound in a manner analogous to photographic recording. The 'view' from the plane as the bombs drop is contrasted with the 'view' from the ground as the plane lands. In The Lost Ocean Liner from the first series, one side contains a 'close-up' of water lapping, while the other contains the 'distant' sounds of foghorns.



The Record as Secular Icon

The increasing importance of records within popular culture has undoubtedly contributed to the interest that they have held for modern artists. They are, indeed, icons of the twentieth century, representing the pop stars that are worshipped. This is particularly true for the current generation of young artists so overtly influenced by the media.

At the beginning of the century, too, there was a considerable interest in records, if not fetishization of them. As early as 1925, artists developed an interest in records as objects. In 1922, Laszlo Moholy-Nagy advocated the use of phonograph records for purposes of production as well as reproduction.18 By this he meant that rather than simply using records to transcribe audio material from the 'real' world, they be manipulated manually to produce original as well as mimetic sounds. The following year, Moholy-Nagy elaborated on this proposal suggesting that conventional records be examined to determine what types of grooves make what types of sounds so that a phonetic groove-script alphabet could be established:

Since the grooves on the mechanically produced record are microscopic in size, we shall first have to devise a method for reducing by technological means down to the normal size of a present-day record any large-scale groove-script record that can be conveniently worked by hand. It would be desirable to make a photograph of a present-day (reproductive) record and to make a photo-clich6 or photo-engraving of the photograph by a zincographical or galvanoplastical process. Should such a record prove to be just more or less playable, the basis for subsequent work along these lines will be established. 19

By 1963, Czechoslovakian artist Milan Knizak had realized direct manipulation of records, but not quite as Moholy-Nagy had intended. Knizak created his Destroyed Music series by altering popular records: scratching, burning, cutting, gluing and applying adhesive tape to them. Some scratches created endless loops, with the stylus remaining stuck in one damaged groove. Other objects were reassembled from broken pieces of several different records. Knizak considers this work to be musical composition. They were intended to be played.

The idea of damaging records was manifested in a number of other works at this time, and continues today. New York artist Christian Marclay employs some of these same techniques to create his altered discs, but with more specific intention I n terms of the resulting sound. In his performances, Marclay spins up to eight altered records simultaneously on individual turn-tables. He composes with several piles of records that he prepares and sorts in advance, thus knowing from what pile to select a disc for a desired effect at any time during the performance. The individual records are notated with stickers that identify specific passages and are sometimes applied to create loops. He drops the needle on to the record after the first of two stickers and when it hits the second it jumps back to the first and repeats. Sometimes the records are played at non-standard speeds. Into other records, he drills additional centre holes (off-axis), creating a wobbly effect. His Record Without a Cover is a recording of one of these performances. The studio performance is pressed onto one side of the disc. On the other, embossed lettering instructs the owner not to store the record in a protective sleeve. The scratches that result from handling enhance the quality of the sound and make each copy unique.

Marclay also makes unique objects. Cutting intricate patterns out of several records with ajeweller's saw, he then glues the different pieces back together to construct a collaged disc. His Dialogue LP with Two Profiles, for example, fuses two profiles of faces cut from black vinyl spoken word discs onto an orange musical disc. As the record spins, music plays until the needle pops at the splice and a voice speaks when the needle passes over the black vinyl figure. The cycle then repeats, resulting in a conversation between the two figures. Other pieces use geometric designs and discs with different content. The splices in all of these records create pops that become rhythmic elements of the total piece.

San Fransisco performer Boyd Rice comes out of the punk movement of the late 1970s. Since 1977 he has released several altered recordings. Early pieces were made on tape, splicing pieces of different recordings together. One consists of every recording of Lesley Gore singing the word 'cry.' Later records utilized off-axis holes and instructed the listener to play 'at any speed.' Still other records include several sound-tracks of endless loops pressed deliberately into the record that endlessly repeat short sound effects. Listeners are encouraged to listen to these closed grooves as songs.

Boston composer Roger Miller (not the country and western singer) emerged from the new wave band, Mission of Burma. His Pop Record is an acetate pressing (used for test pressings of commercial records and not a stable enough process to withstand more than a few plays before deteriorating) on which he assembled the scratchy sounds from in-between songs of his favourite records. As the record of these 'pops' is played, new pops are quickly created. A protective cover becomes irrelevant because playing it actually destroys it. It is certainly not a pop record in the generally held sense of that term. As extreme as Miller's brand of pop seems to us today, it has its precedence in Marinetti's use of radio static in 1933.

The ideas in the air at the beginning of the century are still very much present in the work of many contemporary artists. Performance artists still use records to preserve their work. Pop artists have realized and extended the notion of concrete composition that Marinetti and his contemporaries began. In the streets of Baku, the cabarets of Zurich and Berlin and the auditoriums of Paris and Milan, artists of the early twentieth century turned music, as it had once been known, on its head. Speech became abstract and music became concrete. And today a generation of art students has seized that once sacred and magical phonograph record and profaned it to the point that the line between the fine art and popular practice of record-making is as tenuous as the grooves of Miller's record.





Notes

1 Walter Benjamin. 'The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction,' (1936) in Illuminations, edited and translated with an introduction by Hannah Arendt (New York: Schocken Books, 1969). Benjamin briefly discusses phonograph records in this context and even writes about Marinetti and the Futurist aesthetic in his epilogue. While he does not discuss Marinetti's sound works, or any specific works, he characterizes Futurist work as fascist. 'All efforts to render politics aesthetic culminate in one thing: war.'

2. Many original recordings of Marinetti are in the Historical Recordings Collection at Yale University's Sterling Library. Marinetti's papers are also at Yale in the Beinecke Library. His sound poem Zang Tumb Tumb, which was recorded in 1924 and again in 1935, is contained on several anthologies. The two major sources for the material are: Futurism (1978), EMI Italiana, Milan, 3 C 065-17982 / A; and Musica Futurista (1980), Cramps Records Collana Multhipla, 5206 308 / 2, edited by Daniele Lombardi.

3. F.T. Marinetti and Pino Masnata, 'La Radia' translated from Teoria e Im-ellzione Futurista, Barbara Poggi and Douglas Kahn, trans. (Verona: Arnoldo Mondadori Editore, 1968), pp. 176-i8o.

4. The translations of the sintesi are from the liner notes of Musica Futurista.

5. In a telephone conversation on 28 March 1988, Kirby also suggested that regardless of radio conventions of the time, Marinetti's political clout might have permitted him the indulgence of broadcasting these pieces. I have not personally been able to determine whether these pieces were ever broadcast or not. In Michael Kirby and Victoria Nes Kirby, Futurist Performance (New York: PAJ Publications, 1986). the matter is left unclear. It is, however, one of the few texts that deal with Futurist radio at all.

6. I have not been able to locate any primary sources to support the claim that Schwitters used this dubbing process. The information comes from Everett C. Frost's 'Why Sound Art Works,' The Draina Review, volume 31, number 4 (T 116), Winter 1987, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 109-124. Klaus Schöning's talk was given at the International Congress on the Evolution of Broadcasting, October 1986, at Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec. Klaus Schöning's remarked that Kurt Schwitters was the first to experiment with such manipulations - even before there was audiotape. In the days when recordings were made on wax cylinders, Schwitters dubbed the recording onto film and edited the film into an audio collage.

7. Quoted in Evan Eisenberg's The Recording Angel.- Explorations in Phonography (New York: McGraw Hill Book Company, 1987), P. 151.

8. David Byrne, 'Notes for On The Wall / In the Air M.I.T.' (1984), provided to the author for the exhibition On the Wall / On the Air: Artists Make Noise, Hayden Corridor Gallery, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, December 15, 1984 - January 27, 1985. Excerpts of this statement were originally published in the exhibition brochure (Committee on the Visual Arts, 1984).

9. Laurie Anderson liner notes for Airwaves (New York: One Ten Records. 1977).

10. Though the Beatles have always maintained that their cryptic message on 'Revolution Number 9' was unintentional, supposedly hidden messages were 'revealed' in dozens of popular records by disc jockeys across the globe soon after. Thus the idea of backward messages (to which Anderson's idea is formally related) has been in the air for a decade. In 1985, they received major attention again when Tipper Gore's Parents Music Resource Centre attempted to impose censorship on records that contained 'satanic messages.'

11. Janet Kardon, 'Laurie Anderson: A Synthesistic Journey' Laurie Anderson: Worksftont 1969-1983, catalogue (Philadelphia: Institute of Contemporary Art. 1983). p. 18.

12. Bill Furlong, introduction to Live To Air: artists' sound works, Audio Arts Magazine, Volume 5, No's 3 & 4, London. 1982.

13. Linda Frye Burnham, liner notes for High Performance: The Record (Los Angeles: High Performance Records, 1983).

14. This differs in intention from Cage's 4'33". Cage has stated that the ambient noise of the concert hall was part of this work. Klein intended a total silence - a void.

15. Sound sculptors such as Harry Partch, Harry Bertoia and Jean Tinguely have released their own recordings. Others appear on anthologies. Conceptual artists on record include Lawrence Weiner, Bernar Venet and Jan Dibbets. For further information on these and other recordings see Germano Celent's The Record as Artwork: From Futurism to Conceptual Art, exhibition catalogue (Fort Worth: The Fort Worth Museum of Art, 1977).

16. Duchamp's The Bride Stripped Bare By Her Bachelors, Even. Erratum Musical is a system fa composition. It is described by Petr Kotik in the liner n of Multhipla Record's The Entisical Workl (1976):

It requires:

1. a funnel

2. a toy train with open cars (without locomotive)

3. ball, to be put into the funnel

Each ball bears a number which represents one note of a chosen instrument. The balls fall through the funnel into the cars as they pass underneath. Then, the balls are taken out of the cars and the numbers are transformed into notes (each number representing one note).

17. This and other comments attributed to Borofsky are from a telephone interview in July 1986. Two Dogs in Your Helmut was originally scheduled to be released at that time.

18. Laszlo Moholy-Nagy, 'Production-Re production,' DeStijl, number 7, 1922, PP. 97-1(1. Translated and reprinted in Krisztina Passuth's Moholy-Nagy (New York: Thames and Hudson, 1985).

19. Laszlo Moholy-Nagy, 'New Form in Music. Potentialities of the Phonograph.' Der Sturin, number 14, Berlin, July 1923. Translated and reprinted in Passuth, ibid.

Above copied from: http://www.ubu.com/papers/concannon.html

Monday, May 19, 2008

Kenneth Goldsmith - Interview, Erik Belgum



Erik Belgum: Talk a little about your choice of the [r] sound as the phonemic structuring element on "No. 111." A friend of mine recently came back to the midwest after living in South Africa for several years and he said we all sounded like pirates. He was really keying in on our intense midwestern [r] sounds. I've been particularly interested in [r] since reading Gerard Gennette's book Mimologiques which places the [r] sound at a pivotal point between animal communication and human speech. The grrr of a dog, or wrrrr of a monkey for example. So, in No. 111 why [r]?

Kenneth Goldsmith: The sounds related around [r] is known in linguistics as the schwa [ah, ar, etc.]. I was inspired by the explanation given to me regarding the sacred significance of the Sanskrit word aum. It seems that when one speaks this word, all parts of the mouth are engaged: "au" forms on the outer lips; "uh", spoken second, resides in the middle of the mouth and nasal area; and "um" finishes deep in the throat. No. 111 is a book that was written to encompass the whole of speech and aural experience thus mirroring the Sanskrit ideal.

EB: Is there any particularly rich vein in the language arts that you feel has not been explored? For example, in my opinion, the possibilities of simultaneous speech have barely begun to be tapped, as it is too often treated as a kind of "sound effect" and comes off as basically synonymous with the instruction "insert chaotic sound here."

KG: I feel that the abundance of common, everyday speech which surrounds us has not been explored. We are drowning in a sea of language yet we feel we must jump through hoops to make it "poetic" or "meaningful." Even our most advanced poetries still find a need to make language "poetic." I am curious that there was never a literary equivalent to Pop Art (although I am reminded of Tuli Kupferberg's overtly expressive recitations of advertisements from the mid 60s). Andy Warhol's A is very good and I'm shocked that nobody took that direction into a fruitful practice. Along those same lines, the literary world has had few writers whom employ a Jeff Koons vacuum cleaner-like approach to literature or a Sherrie Levine appropriative use of words on a consistent basis.

I've lately been working on a piece which is nothing but media language — the language that flows out of the television — specifically advertising. It's language we tend to dismiss and as such, I've labeled it entartete wörter, that is degenerated words, what we consider to be language completely depleted of value; nutritionless language. Most people don't want to watch ads and there have been studies made that say we have no more than a 15 second recall on what we've just watched on television. I'm curious as to what effect will occur when we gather an abundance of entartete wörter in one place.

Likewise, we are not paying attention to speech, the second most abundant human product after thought. A few years ago, I did a piece called Soliloquy which was a book of every word I spoke from the moment I woke up on a Monday morning until the moment I went to bed the next Sunday night. It was 400 pages long. The moniker for the book was "If every word spoken in New York City daily were somehow to materialize as a snowflake, each day there would be a blizzard." I wanted to see how much one week of my speech "weighed." I'm interested in concretizing the ephemeral; and there's nothing both more concrete, yet ephemeral, than language.

EB: That's a beautiful analogy. As a follow up, I've often felt that writers often jump through hoops to make their language or work innovative or experimental when the innovation is all around them. Someone recently asked me what avant-garde meant to me and I said that in one sense it seemed like a kind of political trick that I had gotten caught up in for years. I think this was largely because of the above. In what sense is being new or innovative important to you?

KG: An artist responding to their time cannot help but be new or innovative simply because parameters and paradigms shift constantly. This is especially pressing for artists using language which is radically shifting as of late. Only a few years ago, our culture was said to be moving toward the strictly visual (remember the Whitney's "Image World" show of the late 80s); the rise of the Internet has proved that wrong. In fact, due to the web we're responding to language in ways unimagined just a few years ago. Language is being influenced by the technology; compound word URLs are completely Joycean. Suddenly we can read Finnegans Wake and understand it in a different way. Rap music, which began compounding ordinary words to form mass-culture neologisms, is another example. Joyce certainly knew that one day we'd catch up to him yet he never could have anticipated that it would be the internet or rap music that would be responsible for it. I can imagine future generations understanding the Wake in ways my generation (or his) could never have imagined.

EB: Do you write by hand very often?

KG: No. I never write by hand. As a result, my penmanship has completely become illegible. It's bound to happen when people spend all their time typing. In fact, I think that cursive as we know it will be replaced by the script used on Palm Pilots, a sort of shorthand. Before I became devoted to the computer, I used to make drawings which I now no longer do. In fact, I find the computer to be physically engaging enough. I was trained as a sculptor so I have a need to make language physical, concrete. I find that sculpting language on the computer is satisfying enough.

EB: In your mind, does the method of writing you used in No. 111 and Soliloquy, in the sense that you kind of open up a certain linguistic channel and then proceed to let the writing flow through that channel, place you in any way in the tradition of mystics like John Dee or even something like the Koran or the Book of Mormon? Or possibly even some American Indian traditions of storytelling? Given your method of writing these books, a follow up question then presents itself which is the question of authorship. Personally, I think this is a relatively boring question, i.e. "is it really your work if other people said the words?," but I think some of our readers with inquiring minds might want to know.

KG: Almost a century ago Duchamp settled these questions with his Fountain. After that, authorship simply became a matter of framing. I'm shocked how long it's taken our culture so long to legitimize framing or "brushing" content as a valid artistic practice. In the late 70s and we began to see artists like Sherrie Levine "appropriating" images and now, of course, we have a culture built entirely on sampling and recycled material. What was once branded "plagiarism" has long ceased to be an issue.

I don't feel comfortable with the word "mystical" associated in any way with my work. What I do, anyone can do. For example, anyone could rewrite No. 111 using the rules I set up and it would turn out completely different. Same with Soliloquy: anyone can tape and transcribe every word they said for a week and the book would be entirely different. There's just too much shared common language out in the world to ever assume that we are solely possessive of it. Every thought I've ever had I've probably read or heard elsewhere, while wading through this thick band of language which surrounds us daily.

EB: You mention that you were trained as a sculptor. I'm curious, were there specific artists or, better yet, specific works that either forced, or eased, your transition into the world of sound poetry and concrete poetry from the world of sculpture.

KG: It was a long process moving into poetry from fine art which happened over the course of 15 years. As a sculptor, my first mature body of work was very beautifully crafted plywood books, each with texts carved into them. As time went on, I became much more interested in the texts than in the craft of making the books. By the end, I was so invigorated by writing the texts that I began to feel resentful toward the enormous amount of time needed to craft each object. So I stopped making the books and began to instead focus on writing texts. I've ended up a writer, although I came to it in a most unexpected way.

EB: Did any specific artists or works ease the transition?

KG: Like generations before me, I read John Cage's Silence and found that it granted certain permissions I was seeking in my own practice. That was in the late 1980s and although Silence was published in the early 60s, it's amazing how potent that book still is. Cage's message goes in and out of fashion depending on the cultural climate but it seems that some portion of every generation ends up rediscovering it for themselves as I did. Recently, many of the experimental digital musicians are working out Cagean ideas and we're seeing rock groups like Sonic Youth embrace the same tradition.

EB: I suppose there is an obvious connection between your highly systematized method of writing and the work of the OULIPO group. However, I see a very significant philosophical difference. I think it comes from Cage's influence that you just mentioned and it all centers around the word "Potential." Briefly, it's this. The OULIPIENS, even though they have produced many "finished products" are, at least philosophically, expressly interested in the formula or the system over the finished product. That's why they call it "Potential Literature." Although many people don't see it this way, Cage was the exact opposite. For him, the detailed working out and realization of a system or formula was a critical step and this seems to be a critical step in your work also. For example, instead of actually recording and documenting all your speech for a day, you could have realized Soliloquy as a Dick Higgins' type of instruction that said "Record and transcribe all your speech for 24 hours." To me that would have been a OULIPIEN versus a Cagean approach to the same project. There's a question in here somewhere, but I'll leave it to you to find.

KG: One of the greatest problems I have with OULIPO is the lack of interesting production that resulted from it. While I like the idea of "potential literature," it strikes me that their output should have remained conceptual — a mapping, so to speak; judging by the works that have been realized, they might be better left as ideas. On the whole, they embraced a blandly conservative narrative fiction which seems to bury the very interesting procedures that went into creating the works.

I'm interested in writing that is born of process and where the process is brought to the forefront of the practice. However, what is more interesting than process is the resultant writing. This sort of writing achieves a balance between Cagean chance operative writing and Oulipian ideals. It allows for a certain amount of control and a certain amount of surprise.

There's a type of sports practice that calls itself Extreme: Extreme Skiing, Extreme Skateboarding, things like this. I'm interested in Extreme Writing; and I'm convinced that the procedures that set it up inform the intensity of the writing. Without going through the rigorous exercise of documenting every move my body made over the course of one day, I never would have achieved the quality of writing that made Fidget the book that it is. And of course Soliloquy achieved the same intensity through its very rigorous process of production.

EB: Anyone who has transcribed speech from tape recordings knows that there's a fairly large amorphous area of, let's call it "material," that gets left on the cutting room floor. Stuff that maybe isn't "language," but is certainly part of communication. Certainly things like coughs, throat clearing, hmms, umms, lips sticking together briefly, unusual breathing patterns are left out, but even phonemic stutters or repetitions of whole words often don't make it onto the transcribed page. What's your position on this "material" in relation to your work which sits, as it does, between spoken and written language?

KG: Soliloquy changed my entire relationship to the spoken word. After Soliloquy, I could never hear language the same way I did before. It became completely opaque and concrete, like lead. Sometimes now when someone is talking to me, I don't hear what they say but how they're saying it. The rhythms of speech come to the forefront — the "um" and the "ahs." After Soliloquy, I am never able to watch movies in the same way; after learning the divergent and stumbling nature of speech, I am never able to drop my suspension of disbelief — the actors speak too streamlined and neatly!

When it comes to transcribing the pieces, certain decisions need to be made. In Soliloquy, all the sounds I considered to be language-based went in it (the um's and ah's). The bodily sounds which you mention — coughs, lips sticking together briefly, etc. — all were moved into Fidget.

Next comes the task of writing and the formal decisions based around it. People often wonder why I punctuated, capitalized etc. the Soliloquy transcriptions instead of leaving it a flow of language á la Molly Bloom. I'm interested in the work reading as a written document, not simply as an historical documentation of spoken language during a certain period of time (although that is what created the work in the first place).

My work finds its final form as language although it assumes a variety of forms along the way: clothing, CDs, gallery installations, etc. are just a few of the many manifestations that my words have taken. While the parameters may be slightly shifted to produce an entirely different sort of products / projects, my work ultimately resorts to a writerly manifestation.

EB: I'd like to hear you talk about your show from 1998 which, I believe, was basically a show of concrete poetry stills taken from a web project. I'm particularly curious how collectors, buyers or investors, etc. reacted to purchasing website stills from the show.

KG: The show to which you're referring was a manifestation of the Fidget project which took many forms: a performance, a website, a musical score, a gallery exhibition and a book. For this show I made "drawings" based on an applet. I snapped screen shots of the Fidget Java applet and then entirely reconstructed the screen shots out of monochromatic hand-cut paper. They were very beautiful and very well crafted, yet they still failed to sell. The critical response, however, was different: The New York Times positively reviewed the show without once mentioning the derivation of the images; instead, they focused on the craftsmanship and the content of the work. In the art world, the cult of the artist's hand still reigns supreme. At this late date, artworks of mechanical reproduction still generally fail to sell.

On the other hand, the web has given the hand-crafted arts a new life. Until a computer can reproduce the physically visceral qualities of a painting, painting remains a valid practice. In fact, with everyone creating graphics from the same tools such as PhotoShop and Illustrator, coupled with the limited aesthetic range of a 72 DPI screen, those things made by hand seem more important and valuable than ever.

EB: A similar economic question is this: are you ever approached by business types who maybe wanted to advertise on, or buy, UbuWeb?

KG: Not really. Poetry is such a non-profit economy that it functions outside the general traffic of capital. However, I do have people constantly trying to buy the domain name from me, often offering very high prices for it. Of course, I never sold.

EB: It strikes me as interesting that many of the folks involved in sound poetry as practitioners are also often quite involved in the practical, curatorial, editorial, distribution end of their art form. Your UbuWeb website dedicated to concrete, visual and sound poetry (ubu.com) is a perfect example. Some other examples just off the top of my head are Gaburo's Lingua Press, my own VOYS CD journal, any of the numerous Kostelanetz anthologies, Larry Wendt's curatorial work. There are lots of others. What do you make of this? Am I imagining that this phenomenon is more prevalent in soundtext work? What drove you to set up the UBU site?

KG: As I said before, poetry generally is so off the beaten track in this culture that if the producers of it don't set up the distribution channels, no one will. And since it lacks the capital and market of painting, it's of no use to museums who might actually be able to fund adventurous poetries which move along similar intellectual tracks as the art they're showing.

I set up UbuWeb in 1996. In the late 80s Ruth and Marvin Sackner purchased some work of mine and flew me down to install their piece and see their collection. I was blown away by their 10,000+ pieces and became very interested in this somewhat obscure art form (unlike Fluxus, concrete poetry has yet to realize any sort of intellectual / economic revival). When I first saw Netscape in January of 1995, I was taken by the way the graphics loaded and were laid out (the interlaced .gifs reminded me of Jean Bory's sequential concrete poems of the 1960s) and it occurred to me then that this was an ideal space to show text and image. I turned out to be correct: the first 5 years of the graphical web's existence has shown to be a perfect melding of text and image and sometimes the entire thing strikes me as one giant work of concrete poetry.

EB: Last fall, my niece, who was in 8th grade at the time, said she was going to do a paper on sound poetry because of what she'd seen there. She found it all on her own, just kind of by browsing around the web. She knew nothing about the subject (nor did her English teacher), but got really caught up in it through your site.

KG: I love stories like that. And they happen all the time. UbuWeb is on countless curriculums all over the world, ranging from grade schools to Ph.D. programs. One of the things that thrills me the most about the web's distributive paradigm is the potential for education and access. Today anyone anywhere can get offbeat and specialized knowledge from their home. Before the web, people were always able to acquire arcane knowledge, but it took a great deal more effort.

EB: Does the creation of sound poetry or concrete poetry, in a way, automatically presume the question of distribution by the very non-book nature of these literary mediums? This goes back to my first question about the tendency of sound poets to get involved in distribution.

KG: I disagree that these literary forms have a non-book nature. Concrete poetry has always been delivered on the page and sound poetry has always been distributed on disc. What I'm saying is that the new methods of distribution are equally suited to unleash these forms from their old methods of distribution, with the result that they are readily available for more people around the world with at a touch of a finger. A book is no longer limited to the 1000 copies that were printed; an obscure sound poetry recording will now never go out of print. The web, at this point, delivers texts, pictures and sound very well, even with slow dial-up connections (it fails with moving images but this will be improving relatively soon). Thus, sound / concrete poetry needn't readjust its historic agenda to become suited for the web. New works will respond to the new medium and the old ones can quite happily live on in their older forms. UbuWeb shows this sort of mix. While our Historical section is comprised of static images that were either scanned or reformatted for the web, our Contemporary section is a mix of static and dynamic web-specific works made of Java, VRML, dHTML, Javascript, RealMedia, Flash, Shockwave, etc. These works are the one that move beyond the book — they cannot be reconstituted for the page without losing some essential quality.

Distribution in the material world is changing too as the 20th century avant-garde is fetishized. One of the unexpected upsides of super capitalism is that there is an abundance of previously unavailable or out of print material from the historical avant garde. For example, an Italian record label, Alga Marghen, has been recently repackaging sound poetry discs gorgeously making them as sexy as any other commercial product. When I took Christian Bök into Other Music in New York City, he bought Alga Marghen's Gil Wolmans LP even though he doesn't own a turntable!

EB: This abundance of material is also leading to what I like best about the whole "electronica" culture. Young kids who've often never heard experimental music listening to LaMonte Young or Stockhausen or Xenakis right alongside of Roni Size or Sonic Youth. I worked with this 17 year old guy and we got talking about music and so we swapped some CD's. The next day he said, "That was great. I love electronic music." The funny thing to me was that I had loaned him "Hymnen," yet he had no problem ingesting it right alongside "Meat Beat Manifesto - Subliminal Sandwich," which he had loaned to me. Now, there's also an incredibly stupid downside to a lot of electronica (although there are incredibly stupid moments in "Hymnen" also). What do you think of the electronica world?

KG: I'm only interested in it in so much as it brings kids into art. Your teenage pal's Stockhausen / electronica connection was probably greased by Thurston Moore's own label, Ecstatic Peace!, releasing a 1971 performance of Stockhausen's Kontakte featuring James Tenney. Any Sonic Youth fan is bound to buy something released by their favorite rock star. It's not a great leap from the noisier bits of SY records to Hymnen. Their ears have been opened by SY. On Sonic Youth's recent CD, the one-time Lollapalooza headliners do respectable versions of John Cage, Christian Wolff, Pauline Oliveros, James Tenney, George Maciunas, etc. pieces. Again, the more curious kids buying this stuff will want to seek out more about these composers. I've seen the same thing happen when DJ Spooky plays electronics for Xenakis concerts: the kids come out in droves to see Spooky and I suppose that many become interested in Xenakis this way.

EB: Who are your favorite writers?

KG: I can respond by saying that I was recently asked to participate in an odd show in which artists were asked to give a list of books that have been particularly influential on their work. These books were then displayed at Waterstone's (the British Barnes + Noble). So, in place of my favorite artists are, here is a bibliography of my most important books:

Bruce Andrews I DON'T HAVE ANY PAPER SO SHUT UP (OR, SOCIAL ROMANTICISM), David Antin WHAT IT MEANS TO BE AVANT GARDE, Walter Benjamin THE ARCADES PROJECT, Samuel Beckett NOWHOW ON, James Boswell THE LIFE OF SAMUEL JOHNSON, John Cage SILENCE, Buckminster Fuller CRITICAL PATH, Abbie Hoffman STEAL THIS BOOK, Henry James THE GOLDEN BOWL, James Joyce FINNEGANS WAKE, M. THE GOSPEL OF SRI RAMAKRISHNA, Georges Perec SPECIES OF SPACES AND OTHER PIECES, Marjorie Perloff RADICAL ARTIFICE, Ezra Pound THE CANTOS, Ron Silliman TJANTING, Gertrude Stein THE MAKING OF AMERICANS, Ludwig Wittgenstein CULTURE AND VALUE, Emile Zola ROUGON-MACQUART SERIES (20 novels), Louis Zukofsky A.

EB: For a closer, how about a similar list of albums/CD's of particular influence on you?

KG: George Antheil BALLET MÉCHANIQUE, Robert Ashley IN SARA MENCKEN CHRIST AND BEETHOVEN THERE WERE MEN AND WOMEN, Béla Bartók THE SIX STRING QUARTETS, The Beach Boys Pet Sounds, The Beatles White Album, Erik Belgum Bad Marriage Mantra, Carla Bley Escalator Over the Hill, Jaap Blonk Flux-de-Bouche, Anton Bruhin In/Out, John Cage Indeterminacy, Cornelius Cardew Piano Music, Ray Charles What'd I Say, John Coltrane A Love Supreme, Noël Coward Classic Recordings 1928-1938, Coyle & Sharpe The Insane (But Hilarious) Minds of Coyle & Sharpe, Miles Davis Pangaea , Claude Debussy Préludes Vol. 1, Donovan A Gift from a Flower to a Garden, Bob Dylan Blonde on Blonde, Hanns Eisler + Bertolt Brecht Collaboration, Morton Feldman Three Voices, Beniamino Gigli Historical Recordings 1927-1951, Alois Hába Centenary, Raoul Hausmann Poemes Phonetiques, The Heptones On Top, The Impressions Keep on Pushing, Charles Ives Symphony No. 4, Charles Ives Universe Symphony, Charles Ives Old Songs Deranged, Mauricio Kagel Der Schall, Los Angeles Free Music Society L.A.F.M.S BOX, Frank Loesser Frank Sings Loesser, Giovanni Martinelli Volume 2, Pietro Mascagni Cavalleria Rusitcana (Gigli), Rod McKuen Takes A San Francisco Hippie Trip,Olivier Messiaen Turangalila-Symphonie, Darius Milhaud Composers in Person, Charles Mingus Better Git It In Your Soul, Thelonious Monk Genius of Modern Music Vol. 1, Thelonious Monk Genius of Modern Music Vol. 2, Thelonious Monk Monk's Music, Moondog Elpmas, Ennio Morricone A Fistful of Film Music, Mothers of Invention We're Only In It For the Money, Carl Orff Orff-Schulwerk Complete Edition, Harry Partch Delusion of the Fury, Giacomo Puccini La Bohème (Toscanini), Giacomo Puccini Turnadot (Serafin / Callas), Giacomo Puccini Tosca (Prêtre - Callas), Maurice Ravel Ma mère L'Oye, Steve Reich Drumming, Terry Riley All Night Flight Vol. 1, Arthur Russell Another Thought, Frederic Rzewski The People United Will Never Be Defeated! (Oppens), Erik Satie Piano Music VolumeS 1-6 (Ciccolini), Sly & The Family Stone Fresh, The Soft Machine Volumes One & Two, Karlheinz Stockhausen Hymnen, Igor Stravinsky Stravinsky Conducts Stravinsky: The Mono Years, Sun Ra The Singles , T. Rex The Slider, Various Artists The Conet Project, Sophie Tucker Her Latest and Greatest Spicy Songs, Tyrannosaurus Rex UNICORN, Tyrannosaurus Rex BEARD OF STARS, Galina Ustvolskaya Piano Sonatas No. 1-6, Edgard Varèse The Varèse Album, Various Artists Ethiopiques 3, Giuseppe Verdi Don Carlos (Giulini), Giuseppe Verdi Falstaff (Toscanini), Giuseppe Verdi Otello (Levine), Giuseppe Verdi Rigoletto (Serafin), Richard Wagner Der Ring Des Nibelungen (Solti), Kurt Weill Lady in the Dark, Kurt Weill Die Dreigroschonoper Berlin 1930, Neil Young On the Beach, ZNR Barricades.

EB: I have sense that you responded to the "favorite CD's" question with a little more relish than the "favorite books" question. I heard Eddie Murphy say that he'd give up comedy and acting in a second if he could be Prince. I heard Wanda Coleman opine that Baraka would give up writing in a second if he could be Archie Shepp. Personally, if I could do what Sly Stone did in the 70's, I would drop the small press/experimental literature world like a hot potato. Am I imagining things or is there anything to this sense, as far as your work is concerned?

KG: Yes and no. A recent book of mine, 6799, is simply a list of my enormous LP and CD collection — about 100 pages worth. And it happens to be sitting on my hard drive as I answer these questions. So I just scrolled down the list and grabbed the most essential ones. In the end, there seemed no reason to edit it.

I've been a music fanatic since 1967 when I got my hands on The Monkee's Headquarters. Since then, I've been an unstoppable music junkie and can't live a day without buying a record. I also host a radio show on WFMU that is always hungry for new material. In addition, I write music criticism for New York Press and other publications. In all honesty, the only reason I went into music criticism was so I could get CDs for free. Now I'm hooked.

I have a hunch that we pursue those occupations where we're at a disadvantage rather than at an advantage. I'm a much more of a naturally talented musician than I am either artist or writer. But I love music so much that I never wanted to ruin it by making it my profession. So I turned to occupations that I wasn't as passionate about. As a result, music remains very free to me. I can have massive contradictions in taste and not have to explain myself. I'm simply a fan.

Oh, and in response to your Sly Stone comment, I another life I would be either Abbie Hoffman, Bob Dylan or Allen Ginsberg.

above copied from: http://www.epc.buffalo.edu/authors/goldsmith/readme.html

Saturday, May 17, 2008

Maximizing Indeterminacy: On Collage in Writing, Film, Video, Installation and Other Artistic Realms (as well as the Shroud of Turin), J. RONALD GREEN



The truth is that my nervous system, interposed between the objects which affect my body and those which I can influence, is a mere conductor, transmitting, sending back or inhibiting movement. This conductor is composed of an enormous number of threads which stretch from the periphery to the center, and from the center to the periphery.

Henri Bergson, Matter and Memory [1]

Charles Simic, in his poem "The Puppet Show," writes

The infinite number of lines

That join to me things and beings,

So that a diagram

Of any moment in my life

Looks like a child's scribble...[2]

This almost describes Jackson Pollock's gestural paintings, Marie Menken's short film on light-writing from her Notebook series (c. 1950), Mary Lucier's video performance installation Fire Writing (1975) and her related closed-circuit video installation Untitled Display System (1975/87). Lucier describes her two aforementioned works as a kind of writing: "Applying the methodology of writing to camera technique was a means by which I sought to extend video's referents beyond its own limited history. I was interested in the displacement that occurs when one tool is assigned the function of another." [3]

Yet this is not the same idea of writing as the cinema "writing" that was called for in Alexandre Astruc's famous 1949 essay, "The Camera-Pen": "[Film d]irection is no longer a means of illustrating or presenting a scene, but a true act of writing."[4] Lucier's is less a true act of writing than an allusion to the imbeddedness of the expressive gesture in a material, mediated situation, which she demonstrates not just through the Menken-like and Pollock-like video images themselves as gestural, expressionist art, but through her own performance of "writing" within a formal installation that demonstrates not just the human gesture but the material situation of that gesture and its technological apparatuses. Her work also alludes to something akin to the "expansive Derridean notion of ecriture--understood as a 'theoretical hypothesis' which replaces the notion of sign with that of 'trace,' referring processes of signification back to a differential movement whose terms are unassignable and unfixable." [5]

Even if such allusions are not so expansive or so specifically "unassignable," the abstracted mimicking and representation of writing is a familiar theme in the visual arts. Lucier's Fire Writing fits this thematic tendency, and Simic's fragment of poetry illuminates the artistic impulse of writing as a suggestive instance of an urge to represent situatedness. Simic's scribble, Lucier's writing and Deleuze's passage from the visible to the "legible" are indicators of a relation to communication, in the expanded sense of the word that means "to join or connect."

This idea can be posed against Rosalind Krauss's influential characterization of the video medium as essentially narcissistic in her 1978 essay "Video: The Aesthetics of Narcissism." As important as Krauss's essay was 20 years ago, it seems that the artist's body's fascination with itself in the "mirror" of video space is a fascination not just with the body's self, but also with the way others see it (as Krauss later made crystal clear in Passages in Modern Sculpture [1981]); with the body's objective relatedness to specific sites; and with the body's general situatedness. These concerns are not essentially narcissistic and not necessarily anti-analytical in the sense that made Freud pessimistic about the curability of narcissists. In fact, Krauss's footnote on Freud highlights the difference rather than the similarity between narcissism and the works of video art that Krauss chose to focus on:

Freud's pessimism about the prospects of treating the narcissistic character is based on his experience of the narcissist's inherent inability to enter into the analytic situation: "Experience shows that persons suffering from the narcissistic neuroses have no capacity for transference, or only insufficient remnants of it. They turn from the physician, not in hostility, but in indifference." [6]

Krauss's narcissistic video artists--Vito Acconci, Lynda Benglis, Bruce Nauman and Richard Serra--are anything but indifferent. They have enormous capacity for transference, and they insist on the analytic situation, including the body's situatedness. Acconci's videos are social statements, and the self-centeredness shown by Krauss to be undeniably intrinsic to the video medium is demonstrated by Acconci in a way that also ironizes video and self, transcends their self-centeredness and explores their situatedness. Serra's Boomerang (1974) demonstrates the ability of video to make the self strange. Nauman's and Benglis's works are similarly analytical. It is through video that essentially curative work is proposed and attempted and such work is, like Freud's talking cure, communication.

What is odd about Krauss's findings of narcissism in video art is that, until the birth of the Internet, video was the greatest communication machine of all time, especially when combined with its parent, television. Historically and conceptually prior, however, are video's powers of collage. Once that method was possible, then it was the power of communication--the portability or broadcastability of the collaged result--that gave the medium such a huge claim over our lives. As critics such as Andre Bazin and Noel Burch have insisted, this power and this claim did not simply occur naturally. As a vehicle of collage, video is a direct descendant of cinema, which is, in turn, a direct descendant of photography.

In "The Object of Post-Cinema" Gregory Ulmer's discussion of photography sets the stage for the emergence of installation art and reveals a deep affinity between video and installation as each uses a different register of the real, the readymade, the "object itself," as an element of discourse via collage. Ulmer's specific thesis, which centers on the emergence of a "post-criticism," a kind of criticism analogous to postmodernism and poststructuralism, relates collage (and object "mimicry") directly to writing and includes ideas of writing such as the "essai concret." [7] A literal "concrete essay" would be comprised of not words representing things but things, as in installation art. But this is not a new idea. In Book II of Critique of Judgement (1790), Immanuel Kant discusses landscape gardening as a kind of concrete painting, an idea that is suggestive of installation art.

Ulmer casts collage as perhaps "the single most revolutionary formal innovation in artistic representation to occur in our century." [8] Collage was introduced by Georges Braque and Pablo Picasso into painting through use of "actual objects or fragments of objects, signifying literally themselves," [9] expanded by Marcel Duchamp's invention of readymades, reused by Jasper Johns and Robert Rauschenberg to critique abstract expressionism and inherent in "collage machines" such as photography, film, television, video, computers and the Internet. But has all of this culminated in installation art?

There seems to be a descendancy or a teleology in which each new generation of collage machine and of collage informed art is a larger set that incorporates the preceding sets. Cinema incorporates photography; video and television incorporate cinema; and computers and the Internet incorporate all of the above and writing as well. One is tempted to say that installation goes one step beyond the digital, incorporating painting, sculpture and all of the other collage machines including the digital. That this begs the poststructuralist questioning of grand narratives and species-like "descents" goes without saying; but for the moment, I want to see where such a story might lead.

Installation is surely related to the grand narrative of collage (treating things in the world as units of signification), but not necessarily to the collage machines themselves. Installation art and the digital realm are recent but separable tracks of collage discourse. [10] The evolution of the collage machines suggests that the same teleological culmination that can be claimed for installation art can be claimed for the computer/Internet. Up until the time that the digital made its presence known, each new collage machine evolved from and contained the material vestiges of the previous collage machine. This is particularly true of cinema, which was actually a modified use of 35mm photographic strips that had originally been manufactured for still cameras.

The idea of the phylogenic evolution of the collage machines modulates again with the invention of video/television, since the basic image, though still designed as a "still," is constructed out of highly fluid and dynamic electrons; the video "still"--produced by a fast-moving raster, an electronic ray-gun-like beam--is like Lucier's firewriting or Simic's scribble under extreme discipline. Video would seem to be a huge material and formal step, since it set the stage for the digital.

In a pioneering essay on the history of video art published in Millennium Film Journal in 1996, Jon Burris predicted that video will soon be subsumed by the digital multi-media, that video has been merely a precursor of the moving image within the digital domain, and that the analog age will soon be over. [11] He argues that both the "interior" (medium conscious) and the "exterior" (socially conscious) strategies of early video art were thoroughly modernist, the interior because it explored the essence of the medium in a technologically Greenbergian way, and the exterior because it was technologically utopian. The interior strategy was too narrow. Nobody cares much any more about the relation of vertical hold to artistic expression. The exterior strategy was too broad. The liaison of ecology, cybernetics, philosophy, technological theory and politics with video art is legitimate, but none of those alliances is essentially utopian.

In moving forward from the "failure" of modernist approaches to the video art of the late '70s, Burris argues that the postmodernists moderated the adversarial position of video art toward popular culture and mass media. Artists turned to television, making work that was more traditionally narrative; they backed away from their explorations of the video medium itself, instead making statements with the medium. All of the previous concerns--seeing what the machine could do in all of its ramifications and permutations, e.g., the work of Shuya Abe and Nam June Paik, Stephen Beck, Dan Sandin, Bill and Louise Etra, Steina and Woody Vasulka, and many others; seeing what the implications, of the "wired nation" would be, e.g., Paul Ryan, Frank Gillette, Ira Schneider, the Video Freeks, Video Free America and many others--became normalized and narrowed, treated as content within more mainstream media productions. Burns characterizes this trend as a contraction of video's options and concludes that it is no longer a d eveloping medium, finally characterizing video art since the late '70s as a rearguard action.

I would characterize the situation differently. First, it should be noted that the most detailed part of Burris's article deals with the modernist period that he claims ended in the late '70s. As the part of video art that most needs to be recorded for history's sake, Burris rightly has discussed it first. His survey of the later period of "normalization and narrowing" and of "rearguard" action is much less detailed. If the details were filled in, the picture would include the "rearguard" 28- and 56-minute works of innovative television that Burris mentions, but it would also include some works by modernist artists such as Tony Oursler and Bill Viola who continue to invent non-rearguard video. The full picture would also include a new generation of non-rearguard postmodernists such as Sadie Benning, Helen DeMichiel, Stan Douglas and Jane and Louise Wilson. Christine Tamblyn characterized DeMichiel as an example of an anti-establishment deconstructionist and as a collagist. She quotes DeMichiel as saying:

I rob the image bank compulsively. I cut up, rearrange, collage, montage, decompose, rearrange, subvert, recontextualize, deconstruct, debunk, rethink, recombine, sort Out, untangle, and give back the pictures, the meanings, the sounds, the music, that are taken away from us in every moment of our days and nights. [12]

According to Tamblyn, DeMichiel used video as the most advanced and accessible manifestation of new video editing technology. Burris presumably considers that kind of work characteristic of the video medium's further formal mainstreaming. However, it might also be characterized as a continuing teleological movement toward larger sets of collage works, as a further development of video as a discourse of the relations of the whole.

A detailed picture of the "rearguard" era would also reveal a continuation of the kind of interactive video art that Burris discusses in relation to Gillette's, Dan Graham's and Ryan's feedback-related installation works. Margaret Morse, writing on video installation art in 1990, focused on the intensely psychological character of these kinds of video installation, in which "the visitor is enclosed within an envelope of images, textures and sounds." She describes highly localized, individual-body-centered feelings: "it was as if I my body had come unglued from my own image." [13] Morse is then quick to connect feeling with social context, body with environment:

We lack the vocabulary for kinesthetic "insights," for learning at the level of the body ego and its orientation in space. (Perhaps such learning principles might be considered "Deweyian" a "figuring within" as opposed to the "reading" of literature or the "imagining" of pictorial art.) These hypotheses attempt to articulate this kind of experience, in the preliminaries to a poetics of video installation art... [that] address in turn: (1) the conditions of existence of the art form; (2) its plane of expression and different levels within that plane; (3) the disposition of bodies and images in space; and (4) the temporal and experiential passage, reflections toward a metapsychology of video installation art. [14]

I would expect such an article as Burris's to lead up to the work of the present day, including manifestations of video installation art such as those sampled in Barbara London's survey at the Museum of Modern Art in 1995, Video Spaces: Eight Installations. The grand narrative of extracting and remounting, or resituating, chosen pieces of "given" reality--pieces whose connections to former realms is acknowledged as evolving--continues.

For example, Bill Viola's Slowly Turning Narrative (1995) takes two single-channel video image-streams and, by projecting them onto a gigantic rotating mirror, redistributes them around the room, mixing them with other images that the mirror gathers in, including those of the spectators in the room. Douglas's Evening (1994) is a three-channel, three-layer collage of the three major networks' news programming over the years. Gary Hill's Inasmuch As It Is Always Already Taking Place (1990) disassembles the human body into "life-sized" video body parts, then "plays" each body part on an appropriately sized and carefully positioned video monitor. Chris Marker's Silent Movie (1994-95; commissioned by the Wexner Center in Columbus) is a tower of video monitors each running a different program of fragments--many of them "montages" themselves--taken from silent cinema and reintegrated by the installation into an homage to the silent film era. Silent Movie is a monument to the silent film movements, especially emphas izing editing (Soviet montage, German psycho mimesis, American continuity); it is a celebration of a former collage machine (film) by a later collage machine (video) in a sculptural collage form (installation). The discourse of collage also runs through all of the other works in the Video Spaces show.

Is video just another element in installation art, like a sofa or painting or a book or a performer or a layer of pennies or dirt or straw on the floor? Yes and no: yes, because video, like any element in an installation, is treated as a resituated object representing, in part at least, the interrupted, or decised, discourse from which the object was drawn; and no, because video, as a powerful and recent collage machine, represents a discourse very like installation itself, thus opening installation work onto otherwise unavailable vistas of inscription through a very special kind of fenestration.

But video offers not only fenestration, a (gallery) room with a (video) view, but also "durations." Henri Bergson's idea of duration refers to the thing that "happens" when one experiences the workings of "the whole," whose relations are open and changing. The evolving discourse of collage and the technologies and aesthetics of collage machines have a privileged relation to the whole in that they use "real" objects that "represent themselves," and thus are not finally abstracted, but remain connected to the whole.

Duration in Bergson is also the thing that "happens" when the animal nervous system evolves beyond the contractile stage where, as in amoeba, the whole body contracts immediately in a predetermined, automatic fashion whenever anything is touched. Beyond that primitive stage of animal life, the brain with its perceptual devices works precisely to introduce "duration" into the animal's relations with the outside world. To introduce the idea for conceiving of future action requires not only perception at a distance but memory, an "idea" of the past so that future actions can be predicted and programmed based on stored models--template-like models of "the past" used as possible futures. Superimposing memory and possibility implies duration; it is the human animal's version of the present, and it is not unlike collage itself. [15]

Bergson says that the function of the evolved animal brain is to provide duration, specifically for the purpose of sorting out the best possible actions in response to the particular channels of perception that continuously report on the "outside," objective world. The brain, in contradistinction from the reflex contraction of the amoeba, is an indeterminacy device that is not predetermined. Increasing the distance that can be assimilated by human perceptual systems also increases the time that human perceptual and cognitive systems have available to sort out optimal human actions in relation to the changing material world. Technological extensions help to do this. The farther human perceptual devices such as telescopes and radio signals probe into the universe, the more time humans will have to take action against what would otherwise be unimaginable and abjectifying acts of the gods.

If human sight and hearing in conjunction with the human brain comprise an indeterminacy device that is "simply" explained by the need to optimize human action in the world, then image and sound technologies can be seen as extensions of those functions. Speaking, writing, painting, sculpture and the collage machines are systems of such shared perceptual devices; but they are also shared memory. They represent past events that can be superimposed over present events to produce duration and enhance indeterminacy for individuals as social beings. The digitalis the latest analogy to the brain, which is the greatest indeterminacy device we know of. The more complex the array of perceptual and digital devices, the greater the indeterminacy and the greater the chance of our species to optimize its actions in the world.

The arts are a realm of our extensions of perception, memory and indeterminacy that are associated with what Bergson calls "affection" or feeling. [16] Affection as desire leads humans to what they want or need, and affection as pain warns them of what threatens. Immediate threats cause physical pain; distant or possible threats cause psychological pain. Affection motivates action. Perception and affection are related in several ways: perception is "outside" the body; affection is "inside" the body; an increase in "intensity" of perception may increase affection, e.g., an increase in the intensity of touch will turn into pain; affection increases with increased proximity of the perceived to the perceiver, since the body is at risk precisely at the juncture between itself and what it perceives; with extension and distance, perception and affection tend to become representation--what is distant, and potentially beneficial or harmful, must be represented as such to the perceiver/feeler, who is local. The indete rminacy apparatus decides what action to take; the more indeterminacy that the apparatus can handle, the more optimal the results will be.

Writing, painting, sculpture, the collage machines and the digital become part of the "memory"--an important part of the affective memory--and the arts provide the superimpositions needed to optimize human affection in relation to the larger reality, a reality whose nurture and threats we must respect. The feeling of respect for reality, for the whole, is Edmund Burke's sublime.

The digital becomes a crucial next stage in artistic and larger survivalistic indeterminacy. Computers are analogous to the brain and the Internet is analogous to the nervous system. This new extension of the human central nervous system is a huge increase in the controlled complexity of the human body's interface with the rest of the material world, with "nature." Burris is right to emphasize the digital in his critique of video:

Soon to be subsumed by multi-media--the digitization and manipulation of sound and image on computers--video during these first thirty years will eventually be seen as a discrete and unitary phase, the precursor to the moving image in the digital domain. Once that happens, it will be time for a full consideration of the dynamics of its formation, for the analog age will be over and many of the issues which seem ambiguous to us today will stand out with considerable clarity. Only then will we know whether the first videomakers had set the foundations for an art form of lasting importance, or whether video art will have been only an interesting curiosity. [17]

That we are entering a digital age in which terms such as "multi-media" subsume terms such as "video," "cinema," "photography" and even "painting" and "writing" is undeniable. It would be a mistake, however, to see the digital and multi-media as replacing those earlier modes. The digital is the latest thoroughly material collage machine. It is a mistake to imply, as Burris does, that the end of the analog age means the down-grading of the analog mode. That would be like saying that after animals and humans evolved and the age of the central nervous system had begun, that the rest of the body was no longer important, and that the physiological devices for perception at a distance (such as vision and hearing) were to be downgraded owing to the new, utterly Protean capacities of digital code. The advent of the brain and the central nervous system allows for vast elaborations of technological analogs to the human body. Computers are, like brains, utterly material; they both subsume, are subsumed by and prolifera te analog systems and without those analogs computers would be utterly worthless. Non-analog computing is comparable to the kind of subjectivist philosophy that reduces human consciousness to a dimensionless point that somehow projects all experience as if from nothing.

Non-digital, analog mediums--e.g., writing, painting, sculpture, collage machines and installations--are perhaps analogous to "the body" of a digital "consciousness." Those mediums get subsumed in the digital. But those other mediums are not dead in the sense that critics like to pronounce discourses such as the novel and the theater dead. The analog age is no more over than is the material age.

We do not have to wait for the digital age to think of video as being assimilated, becoming only a part of multi-media or the media arts as have all previous collage machines. Video has already chosen to be promiscuous, just as all mediums and discourses have done. One finds photography and cinema within video genetically as well as representationally, as Burris has shown. It seems reasonable to look for larger models to explain how video art emerged and where it is heading. To say that the digital age will supersede the analog age suggests a kind of technological determinism that begs the interesting questions that are larger than technology.

Clearly collage is a grand narrative that incorporates some major concerns within writing (including poetry and criticism), painting (from Braque to Rauschenberg to Laura Lisbon), Ulmer's collage machines (photography, film and video) and the digital. Burris emphasizes video's relation to a digital future, but he could easily have pointed at the end of his article to the extensive exploration of installation by video artists today (he did cover certain installation artists from the first period of video); in fact, the issue of Millennium in which his article is featured explicitly treats video and video installation. Video installation is a pervasive phenomenon in the art world. [18]

This split between installation and the digital as trunk lines of future video art can be resolved at the level of collage. The digital is the latest collage machine, [19] and installation is the expansion of mainstream plastic-art activities--primarily sculpture--farther into the realm of objects in their expanded field of relations with other objects. That expanded field itself includes language, language-like systems and digital code. Which of these two directions-installation art or the digitalis the more artistically compelling? Is one or the other more pervasive, more subsuming, more "indeterminating" and thus potentially more relevant and profound?

The digital seems more compelling since it will soon pervade human activity and in many ways control and direct it. It is easy to counter digital supremacy, however, since objects and object relations already pervade human activity regardless of the incursion of "the simulacrum." The digital helps humans handle object relations. Nevertheless, the realm of the digital will demand overwhelming attention in years to come, since it must be assimilated. Its assimilation will, nonetheless, have to be into object relations and the analog realm. It is only in the analog realm that humans can feed and reproduce. The digital will be important, but it will be primary only in the realm of representation. It is a collage machine dealing with virtuality, a radically reduced, transposed and de-indexicalized version of object relations. Installations can include the digital; but the digital cannot really include installations, only virtual installations. This is a trade-off the digital realm is willing to make, given the ma ddening lack of plasticity in the realm of non-virtual installations. But the losses in the trade-off can be too easily ignored, resulting in illogically exaggerated concepts such as Jean Baudrillard's simulacrum and the hyper-real. Though the idea of the simulacrum is important as a naming of a new disease, Baudrillard plays Madame Curie to his discovery. To claim primacy of the digital over the analog may risk idealism. Code is not and cannot ever be everything; and digital code, though powerful, is not unique. Writing is code, as are painting and the collage machines that precede the digital.

All code must have material support. To a significant degree, the support is part of the message, part of the art, part of the discourse. With the coming of the expanded field of art (seen particularly clearly in sculpture, thanks to the work of Krauss), the material support of art has been explored as a network of forces that extends from very proximate and literal (the shape of the stretcher of a painting such as the paintings on Frank Stella's early custom-made stretchers--the stretchers are literally and referentially the "support") to very distant and figurative (Hans Haacke's inclusions of the geographically removed, neo-colonialist actions of corporations that financially "support" his installations at various museums, and thus his inclusion of ideology as material support). The reasons behind the art world's concern for exploring the support of art needs to be kept in mind when considering the implications and the future of digital art in relation to the analog realm. The analog realm is not just "ou tput" and "interface" for the essentially digital; it is the entire support for the digital--it is prior and primary.

The digital presents serious problems in its relations with human discourse in general and with art in particular. Painting, throughout its history, has been fundamentally concerned with its relation to the real world. Ideas about, attitudes toward and strategies of realism have been central to it from cave art through abstract art. Photography, the first collage machine, advanced this central concern by mechanically introducing the indexical tracing of the real world. The tracing of hands by the early cave painters was both an iconic and an indexical (as well as a symbolic) act of signage; photography mechanized such acts, especially that of the icon and index. Cinema and video then inherited the gene of indexicality from photography, first introducing photographic motion, then photographic real time, e.g., temporal immediacy (live TV and video). The problem with the digital collage machine that comes after cinema and video is that the indexical gene radically mutates. One can find the gene in certain circu mstances, but it has become entirely virtual and thus unstable. Any instability in the indexical is a problem by definition, and thus inherently fatal to the host idea of index.

This problem is only a problem if one expects the digital to perform the work of the previous collage machines; it is not a problem if one expects the digital to do the kind of work that painting or sculpture do. There can be no doubt, however, that the photographic collage machines are being digitalized at a rapid rate. This is the sense in which Burns is right to say that the digital is the next era. But what will be the relation of the digital to its support? How will digital art engage with current art-world concerns about the material relations of objects? No doubt that concern will emerge in digital art, but not without recognizing the continuing primacy of the analog realm.

One of the most compelling current installations in relation to this issue occurs outside of the art world. The Shroud of Turin has been placed on display in such a way that it serves as an example of the complexity of the relations of collage machines and objects, and of analog and digital. A close analysis of the shroud's installation and reception "settles" the question of the primacy of analog or digital realms. The shroud was installed not just in the old-fashioned sense of installing a work in a show. This installation was site-specific, elaborate, performative, ritualistic and fraught with meaning in its own right:

Hung lengthwise over purple drapery high in the dark nave of the Turin Cathedral, the shroud bears the faint traces of a man's face, limbs and folded hands, visible even behind the bulletproof, hermetically sealed glass casing and steel frame. [20]

Believers want to prove that the shroud is not art, that it is the one, true burial shroud. For the vast majority of those who are interested in the shroud, authenticity--the shroud's relation to the indexical--is the issue. In spite of the centrality of that issue, it is easy to see why the New York Times chose to use a picture of the shroud's image projected onto the wall rather than the shroud itself. This photograph of the shroud's image represents the "fascination" that the Times refers to in the headline, "Power to Fascinate Intact..." The image is in color so that the luminous blue light of the slide projector adds a technologically enhanced aura to the inherently ghostly figure; this figure of light is made to hover above the furniture of the museum on an invisible wall. What we are looking at is a half-tone newspaper reproduction of a photograph of a projection of a slide of a photograph-like image of, allegedly, Jesus.

This chain of indexical meaning is important to the reception of the shroud and its installation, and the indexicality centers on the idea of photography:

Modern fascination with the shroud, and scientific testing, blossomed in 1898, when on May 28 Secondo Pin took the first photographs of the shroud during one of its rare viewings. While developing the film, Mr. Pia was astounded to see that what had been faint markings on the linen appeared as a dear, fully formed image of a man on the photographic negative. The cloth shows the front and back of a man's body, and its markings are actually a negative image--photographic negatives reveal the positive image in seemingly three-dimensional.... [21]

That a photograph played a part in revealing the "photographic" nature of the shroud is semi-coincidental; nevertheless, a deeper logic of photography underlies the "modern fascination" with the shroud and pervades the debate over its authenticity. The purchasers of the best-seller that called the shroud a literal "snapshot" of the Resurrection are presumably looking for something so important to them that they are willing to accept the contradiction that something can be literal and still need inverted commas around it, and that an image of a dead man can directly, indexically represent the defeat of death. Part of what these people are looking for is a concatenation of effects--an apparatus, an institution, authentic evidence--that defeats time and death, in the sense discussed by Susan Sontag in On Photography, Roland Barthes in Camera Lucida and Andre Bazin in What is Cinema? [22]

The obsession with the recreation of an integral reality of our own image underlies the profound importance of realism as a mode in the arts and sciences and it continues in today's editions of the myth, including the fantastic and the digital. It matters that the flights of wishful thinking provided by Hollywood and television are believable, that they are "just like reality." The same is true of pornography, ethnography, the evening news and digitally produced virtual reality. In all of these realms the modern answer to the need for "reality in our own image" is provided by the collage machines. And photography has played the key role owing to its intrinsic indexicality; its decisive, interventionistic powers of d[acute{e}]coupage, assemblage, montage; a certain amount of plasticity in its elementary materials; and its portability. But recently the digital has transformed the realms of plasticity and portability. The portability of the digital is instantaneous and global. And the plasticity of the digitali s so competent at realistic effects that it has become virtually indexical, and virtual indexicality is a logical contradiction. This conflict between the indexical photographic foundations of the collage machines and the new digital plasticity can be seen clearly in the controversy surrounding the Shroud of Turin.

In a listing of some of the pros and cons of the shroud controversy, the Times mentions that, on the one hand, the shroud "is a negative image and not a painting. No medieval forger would have been likely to depict such an image, not knowing the principles of photography"; and on the other hand," [t]he images over the eyebrow with the coins--which only became visible with photographic enlargement and computer processing--could have been enhanced recently on a computer." [23]

It is clear why photography is important to the debate over authenticity; and it is understandable that the next generation of digital collage machines has entered the lists since certain of its capacities for plastic revision of original material can aid in authentication. The computer enhancements mentioned above provide one of the key points supporting the shroud's authenticity: "Some scholars say that over the right eye and the left eyebrow appear the impression of two coins with the letters (TIBERIO)Y K(AISAROS), or Tiberius Caesar, dating from 30-31 A.D." [24] The problem, however, is that these same details also count against authenticity, since computer enhancement can be tantamount to forgery. The computer, with its radically unstable indexicality, cannot be relied upon to resolve this problem; and it is this problem that makes all the difference.

Significantly, two large-scale approaches to publicizing the shroud have been adopted. First, an ecstasy of communication, in the sense complained of by Baudrillard when he says, exaggeratedly, that "[t]here is no longer any system of objects," [25] and when he says that:

today there is a whole pornography of information and communication, that is to say, of circuits and networks, a pornography of all functions and objects in their readability, their fluidity, their availability, their regulation, in their forced signification, in their performativity, in their branching, in their polyvalence, in their free expression....

It is no longer then the traditional obscenity of what is hidden, repressed, forbidden or obscure; on the contrary, it is the obscenity of the visible, of the all-too-visible, of the more-visible-than-the-visible. It is the obscenity of what no longer has any secret, of what dissolves completely in information and communication. [26]

As the Times puts it, with regard to the shroud:

Now, at its unveiling, for the fourth time in this century and at the cathedral's 500th anniversary, there are scores of new, revisionist scholars who are casting doubt on the doubters and broadcasting their findings over the Internet. On the cusp of the millennium, the shroud has taken on yet another significance--the odd marriage of ancient faith and cyberspace.

...[V]isitors can reserve a viewing time by telephone or over the Internet, and 835,000 have already signed up....millions more will be able to click onto a live Internet hookup to the nave of the cathedral. (http.://sindone.torino.chiesacattolica.it/)

Every detail, theory and countertheory of the relic's remarkable history are chronicled and debated on more than 30 Shroud of Turin websites... [27]

This ecstasy of communication surrounding the shroud amplifies rather than diminishes the aura of the shroud itself as an object, the opposite of what Walter Benjamin predicted in his famous essay, "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction," and the opposite of Baudrillard's claim of a loss of a system of objects. The "museum without walls" effect of the collage machines has indeed made the shroud more accessible to the world so that everyone has ("pornographic") access to it. But the ecstasy of access merely confirms the aura of the original; it confirms the interest of the multitudes in the fact of the shroud's indexicality, its uniqueness. If that uniqueness were a moot issue, there would be no ecstasy of communication about the object and no "mechanical" reproductions of it. It would be just another burial shroud, of interest to a handful of scholars.

The second approach to publicity about the shroud is the choice to open access to the object itself through an installation. This approach would be considered old-fashioned and pre-modern, except that it comes at a time when installation has a new meaning. The shroud's installation, taken in the old-fashioned sense, confirms the continued importance of material reality in the age of communication and virtual reality. It is significant that three million people visited the shroud's exhibition in 1978 and three million were expected again in 1998. Many more will "visit" it virtually, but for the same reasons that will bring the three million to the object itself--because of its indexicality, the same indexicality that made photography such a potent challenge to painting. Today painting remains potent because of its indexical relation to real materials (i.e., because of aura), and photography remains potent because of its indexical relation to real objects (i.e., because of aura).

This fact confirms the undiminished interest in the modern era's celebration of unique objects, of religious and artistic aura, of heroic individuals and of the creative genius of authors and artists. This fact is inherent in the art world's interest in installation. Installation is evidence of the expanded field of authorship, in the knowledge of which one must understand the always-already constructedness of any individual, no matter how original and creative that individual. However, the expanded field does not finally diminish the individual; it expands and extends the individual. Any individual who understands her/his place in the expanded field of the subject has in a sense incorporated that field and has individually expanded her/his capacities for indeterminacy. By understanding determinacies better, one increases indeterminacy for-oneself. Thus, it should be no surprise that installation art is evidence of the need for an extension of individual artistic "genius" into the realm of situatedness, of m aterial object relations.

The rise of installation art is a recognition that our society needs examples of how to arrange the protean world of objects under consumer capitalism. The rise of installation art indicates that, (consumer) society needs to learn how to read and how to "write" diverse situations of object relation. After semiotics and poststructuralism, all things human, and many things inhuman, are seen as "in code."

The digital and installation realms comprise complementary, not contradictory, art practices. One must insist, and artists are insisting through installation art, that code only exists when it is matter, and it only matters when it is objectified; and when it is objectified, it is unique, specific and potentially a determining factor in relation to individual human bodies.

Installation has always been a kind of collage, even before the word collage emerged to name a conscious discourse. Older forms of installation, such as sculptures in piazzas, paintings in churches, furniture in country houses or sculpture, paintings and furniture in museums, demonstrated an ability to carve, shape or manufacture objects, or to loot or purchase such objects, and then install them elsewhere. The resulting arrangements of those reassemblages had great, often overdetermined, meaning. Contemporary artists have appropriated the discourse of object appropriation for purposes of conscious artistic expression.

Those old-fashioned installations often included books and manuscripts, letters and writing desks, just as current installation art, such as that by Ann Hamilton, often includes. Her work demonstrates the assimilation of the writerly collage machines--whose apparatuses and support systems were explored formally and ideologically in the 1970s by the film artists of the New American Cinema and by the Structuralist Materialist filmmakers of Great Britain--into the lifeworld. Hamilton's 1996 show at the Wexner Center in Columbus, Ohio included numerous, often humorous, prosthetic devices and several elegant film and video installations that update the work of the late media artists Horns Frampton and Paul Sharits. It was a massive exploration of the way we live with collage machines. In some ways, those machines were treated as McLuhan-like extensions of man, technological indeterminacy devices; but the prosthetic devices sometimes implied crippled postmodern bodies. More optimistically, they evoked a material, palpable eroticism enhanced by a video glow. The digital was treated in that spirit in Hamilton's show. The video logo for her CD-ROM piece The Body as Object Ann Hamilton 1984-1996 was the show's most tactilely erotic image, a probing digit, a "digital" work as caressing, articulating, probing as a finger's touch, a pun by which body and soul seem intimately to communicate.

Collage has given the world a new legibility, has made it physically segmentable, composable, revisable and re-readable. The world has always been readerly: the ancients were always on the lookout for auguries and signs of the world's meaning in, for example, the entrails of animals, the flight of birds, the movement of planets and the weather--it was part religion, part science. Moderns still read the world's geological strata, weather and DNA, but modern collage has made the world increasingly writerly; we are unintentionally rewriting the weather through ozone depletion, and we can edit DNA. The ancients also "wrote" and edited their environment, but less extensively than they read it. Increased writerliness is part of what Simic intuits as a diagram of his situation in the world in "The Puppet Show" what Lucier attempts in Fire Writing, what Hamilton doodles with her CD-ROM finger, pointing to what Deleuze refers to as "passage from the visible to the legible."

The expanded writerliness of the world manifests the human drive "to secure the perfect fitting of [the human] body to its environment, to represent the relations of external things among themselves--in short, to think matter," as Bergson posits in Creative Evolution. [28] In a world that is, for better or worse, increasingly comprised of man-made or man-handled pieces of the whole, those recombinant pieces increasingly communicate through Bergson's "threads which stretch from the periphery to the center, and from the center to the periphery"--because the pieces of our world are more and more decised from the whole and recombined by humans. Since we are always attempting to "think matter" more attractively, but always less convincingly, than matter is "thinking us", the artistic and critical exploration of collage and its machines is increasingly vital. [29]

J. RONALD GREEN teaches film studies in the Department of History of Art at Ohio State University. His book on Oscar Micheaux, Straight Luck, is forthcoming from Indiana University Press.

NOTES

(1.) Henri Bergson, in N. M. Paul and W. S. Palmer, trans., Matter and Memory (New York: Zone Books, 1991, orig. 1908), p. 45.

(2.) Charles Simic, "The Puppet Show," in Hotel Insomnia (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1992), P. 39.

(3.) Mary Lucier, "Light and Death," in Doug Hall and Sally Jo Fifer, eds., Illuminating Video: An Essential Guide to Video Art (New York: Aperture, 1990), p. 458. Lucier's reference to "the methodology of writing" must be taken loosely. Lucier may have a method but it is not writing; writing is a theme in Lucier's work, not a method.

(4.) Alexandre Astruc, "The Birth of a New Avant-Garde: la cam[acute{e}]ra-stylo," orginally published in L'Ecran Francais, No. 144, 1948, and translated in Peter Graham, ed., The New Wave (New York: Doubleday, 1968), p. 22.

(5.) Robert Stam in Robert Burgoyne and Sandy Flitterman-Lewis and Robert Stam, eds., New Vocabularies in Film Semiotics (New York: Routledge, 1992); p. 26.

(6.) Rosalind Krauss, "Video: The Aesthetics of Narcissism," in Gregory Battcock, ed., New Artists Video (New York: E. P. Dutton, 1978), reprinted in John G. Hanhardt, ed., Video Culture: A Critical Investigation (Rochester, NY: Visual Studies Workshop, 1986), p. 90.

(7.) Gregory L. Ulmer, "The Object of Post-Criticism," in Hal Foster, ed., Anti-A esthetic Essays on Postmodern Culture (Seattle: Bay Press, 1983), p. 102.

(8.) Ulmer, p. 84.

(9.) From Edward Fry's Cubism, quoted in Ulmer, p. 84.

(10.) "Discourse" is not an adequate term; it tends to confuse the idea of collage with "story." My use is closer to Foucault's "discursive formations,"--"i.e., the linguistic practices and institutions that produce... knowledge claims, usually correlatable with a disseminated power, within which we exist socially [Stam, New Vocabularies, p. 211]"--but it is not clear that collage is such a discourse; what are its knowledge claims? What would be its relation to power? Maybe "working method" or "formal method" or "mode" would be clearer; Ulmer uses "formal innovation" but collage is no longer an innovation.

(11.) Jon Burris, "Did the Portapak Cause Video Art? Notes on the Formation of a New Medium," in Millennium Film Journal, no. 29 (Fall 1996), p. 28.

(12.) Christine Tamblyn, "Significant Others: Social Documentary as Personal Portraiture in Women's Video of the 1980s," in Illuminating Video, p. 414.

(13.) Margaret Morse, "Video Installation Art: The Body, the Image, and the Space-in-Between," in Illuminating Video, p. 153.

(14.) Ibid., pp. 153-54.

(15.) Bergson, Chapters 1 and 2.

(16.) Bergson, p. 53.

(17.) Burris, p. 28.

(18.) See Cynthia Chris, "Video Art: Stayin' Alive," in Afterimage 27, no. 5 (March/April 2000), pp. 10-12.

(19.) I use "machine" loosely in the spirit of two definitions from Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary. "la. archaic: a constructed thing whether material or immaterial... e (1). An assemblage of parts that transmit forces, motion, and energy one to another in a predetermined manner."

(20.) Alesandra Stanley, "Power to Fascinate Intact, Turin Shroud Is Unfurled," New York Times (April 19, 1998), p. 1.

(21.) Ian Wilson, author of the best-seller The Shroud of Turin: The Burial Cloth of Jesus Christ? (New York, Doubleday, 1978), described it as "a literal 'snapshot' of the Resurrection."

(22.) Susan Sontag, On Photography (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1977); Roland Barthes, Camera Lucida, Reflections on Photography (New York: Hill & Wang, 1981); Andr[acute{e}] Bazin, "The Myth of Total Cinema," in Hugh Gray, ed. and trans., What Is Cinema? (Berkeley University of California Press, 1967), pp. 21-22. Bazin also mentions the shroud in his "Ontology of the Photographic Image" in What is Cinema?

(23.) "Sorting It Out: Shroud of Controversy," box insert, New York Times (April 19, 1998), p. 6.

(24.) Ibid.

(25.) Jean Baudrillard, "The Ecstasy of Communication," in Foster, Anti-Aesthetic, p. 126.

(26.) Ibid, pp. 130-31.

(27.) Stanley, pp. 1,6.

(28.) Henri Bergson, Creative Evolution, Arthur Mitchell, trans. (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1983, orig. 1907), p. ix.

(29.) This essay is dedicated to Paul Sharits and Hollis Frampton. This essay is a response to a series of presentations and exhibitions organized by Philip Armstrong, Lisa Florman, Laura Lisbon, Jan Maiden and Stephen Melville at the Jan Maiden Fine Art Gallery in Columbus, Ohio in the Spring of 1998. I am grateful to Armstrong and Lisbon for important readings.

-1-

Questia Media America, Inc. www.questia.com

Publication Information: Article Title: Maximizing Indeterminacy: On Collage in Writing, Film, Video, Installation and Other Artistic Realms. Contributors: J. Ronald Green - author. Journal Title: Afterimage. Volume: 27. Issue: 6. Publication Year: 2000. Page Number: 8. COPYRIGHT 2000 Visual Studies Workshop; COPYRIGHT 2002 Gale Group